Limit how many MGs can be in a squad

Suggestions - Archive
1

And then add a suppression mechanic as I mentioned in my previous post.

Videos are coming out of this vickers squad winning games in sub 4 minutes. It is completely broken. Go watch quadro’s video. The MG role needs to be improved immensely, especially with the coming changes to the tech tree, which will make it easier to get. Which it should be btw, but not in this state. Add suppression, make it fulfill the role of an actual MG and then limit how many can be in each squad, maybe 2. I also recommend letting the MG carry ammo boxes they can drop.

1 Like
2

Nah, I do not want to go watch Qaudro. The biggest dramaqueen of Enlisted’s community.
Is he planning another boycott?

6 Likes
3

lol that was Quadro with his stack against noobs/bots. If he tried that against really good stack of enemy players or some crazy CN stack those games would end in paratrooper farm fiesta.

Anyone can blitzkrieg against bots/noobs within 5 min even without paratroopers. I know was there when this game didn’t even have them.

4 Likes
4

Pretty sure that vid was a stacked premade with comms and coordinated vs no one of note

Can blitz anygame like that with *insert squad here

2 Likes
5

I was screaming it’s been a problem the Germans need their own 100 round MG’s to counter it and a FG 42 grenade launcher Does not really help bullets are more reliable than grenade launcher Because of the stealth Nerf they’re doing two explosives

6

There is no way people can believe an entire squad of MGs should be possible in this game… Do you not see the issue at all?

7

And what about premium squads that are full of mgs. What are you proposing? Nerf those too even people paid for them?

1 Like
8

Im confused.

In the other thread you were saying MGs were worthless and need supression mechanic.

But here you think they too strong? Or if they are “worthless” what does it matter how many there are?

2 Likes
9

Might be schizophrenia that we’re dealing with in here.

3 Likes
10

I think he’s referring more to rapid deployment of MG’s all over the map with paratroopers

11

I would love to see DF changing premium MG squads from 5 to 2, lol.
It would hilarious to watch another community shttstorm they themselves created.

1 Like
12

this was before paratroopers (from week worth of battles)

image
image739×1500 374 KB

overall nothing to do with paratroopers, everything to do with stacks and shitty enemy team full of bots. paratroopers just make those battles go faster.

1 Like
13

Some suck ass and some are insanely good, the vickers in particular. As well as what greyparrots said, deploying them all over the map changes things immensely.

1 Like
14

Yes. Nerf them even though people paid for them. You dont have some kind of “right” to being OP because you spent money. I am not worried about smgs, but lmg squads with a bunch of vickers are insane. They are easily useable point blank which makes it completely OP. They should not be implemented this way. They should be fire hard to fire at close range and they should have a suppression mechanic encouraging a different playstyle.

15

Yep, it’s not like they wouldn’t lose anyway. They just blame paras because it’s something new. And obviously, everyone wants to try new thing. So they’re pretty common nowadays. It was like that always.
They always trying to find excuses. It’s so annoying.

16

If you think this weapon is “insanely good”, you probably do not even own it.

17

18

First of all make MGs behave like MGs. Then we can think about additional changes.

Imo making MGs not oversized SMGs will cause many ppl to stop using it.

4 Likes
19

This is what I am basically saying.

20

You are acting acting like there are many people that are currently using them, lol.

It’s just another random shttstorm rn, because some normies saw 100 rounds and it’s immediately OP.
Every faction has already 100 rounds weapons. Every faction even has 100 round smgs which are btter than MGs.

It’s so interesting it wasn’t problem month back, very interesting.