As you can see, the predecessor of the M1 Carbine gets the semi-automatic rifle bonus, while the M1 Carbine itself is categorized under assault rifle bonuses. This is very unreasonable. With its 8.8 damage, it deserves a rate of fire of 460 rounds per minute.
I heard that moderators from the Russian forum stated the magazine capacity was listed incorrectly, and the actual capacity is 10 rounds. If it really uses a 10-round magazine, how would you rate its combat effectiveness?
That’s well put. It’s totally reasonable to care about the quality of this Victory Day event rewards. I’m also concerned about the reward quality too. Would you have time to come take a look at my post?
I think removing its armor-piercing rounds would keep it from matching up against the Ferdinand and Tiger, and that would be a worthwhile trade-off. After all, it is essentially a turretless KV-2 with 90mm armor. Everything comes with pros and cons.
I feel the moderators have overlooked my post. Nowadays, they no longer remove newly posted duplicate threads. I’m worried all my hard work on this post will get buried. Right now I’m reaching out to other players to check it out and give me their support.
Sorry for taking up your comment section.
Without any crew skill reload bonuses, the KV-2 has a 10-second faster reload than the SU-152. Isn’t this completely counterintuitive? A turreted vehicle reloading faster than a turretless tank destroyer.
Still, what we need to discuss right now is its battle rating placement. Being moved to BR4 is practically a one-way ticket to BR5, and no player would welcome this change. Only those who main Soviet vehicles can truly understand this sense of frustration.
