Or two 200 liter drop tanks
The Kawanishi N1K2-Ja Shiden Kai can hold 4 60kg rockets
Perfect BR III aircraft.
It can have 250 kg bombs even. For N1K2 there is many many options I have full topic about its variants.
Kawanishi N1K 紫電改 Violet Lightning Variants 
- Suggestions / Vehicles - Enlisted — official forum
1 Like
Yeah, I’d also be fine with it going down to br3 as is. It would be way better than the fw a8 though, but don’t think either of these payloads are too strong there. I really don’t like 2x 60kg bombs in br3, but I guess the plane itself makes up for it.
No with the rockets will be too strong for BR III since it has good performance. With the rockets I dont know its a bit too much will be better FW and FW is already amazing plane. If its with bombs will be like the Spitfire but with rockets I dont know they are better then the 60 kg bombs.
I’m just not sure I’d ever really want to take it over the ki-100 though if it only has the two small bombs. Sure it’s got 4x 20mm, instead of 2x, but the ki 100 does what it needs to do with only 2. If it retained the rockets in br3, it would be more worthy of bringing for it’s different type of payload. I mean, it is only 2 rockets at the end of the day.
I’m just saying i wouldn’t care is all, but i think we can both agree it’s in a pitiful state for br5
1 Like
Its much better then Ki-100 I will for sure take it over Ki-100 but you must never forget that its on a different pilot slot so you can have Ki-100 and J2M3 at the same time. I mean the devs can try but just like the spitfire the performance its amazing its not a bad plane.
Just looked at the stats. It’s definitely faster, but not by that much, the ki has slightly better turn time (hardly anything). Now for the biggest downsides that i see, the 20mm cannons on the j2m3 shoot at about half the fire rate of the ki and then of course the would be payload difference.
Am i missing something that makes this way better? I actually don’t think I’ve ever used it. Typically used the ki 84 and now kikka for br5
(Ki shoots at 948 and 900 rpm. J2m3 shoots at 490 and 516 rpm)
it has 4 cannons so it can boom and zoom and dog fight. Type 99 Mark 1 Model are bad yeah but still its 20 mm cannon so frontal engagement will be stronger then the Ki-100.
Kikka is too OP its a jet with huge bomb who will use prop over it I do it for fun. If you play to win Kikka is your best option.
Right but my point is, because of the fire rate difference, it doesn’t matter that the ki only has the two 20mm. It shoots out about the same amount. The difference would be the spread, but with the ki you’re actually getting significantly more lead out with the two 12mm guns ontop. The more i think about this, I don’t see a big difference at all between the two other than ~50kmh +/- speed. I think it should go to br3 as is.
1 Like
Well its not only air to air game the 20 mm cannons can destroy apcs and other stuff so if I have option J2M3 is more fun to play. I dont need huge bombs to enjoy a plane and J2M3 offers you a lot of options it can go over altitude 1400 without a problem while over 1000 the Ki-100 starts to struggle its also small target so J2M3 for me is the better plane. Also J2M3 roll rate is better that is good for exchange.
Having good tanks, not knowing how to use them is another matter.
P-80, Meteor, Offenhor, etc. Pure fantasy and captured weaponry that is in your TT
The fact that they don’t know how to aim and find the enemy tank’s weak point is a problem of the allied player base.
It’s incredible how you play the victim and you’re the perfect example of
1 Like
…but they still haven’t decided…
1 Like
I prefer the regular Pershing it eats tigers for breakfast but I’m a super unicorn game so… it’s not really fair for me to speak on the experience of the average joe.
not fictional too early it’s a Korean war modification.