La7 and J2M3 ➡ BR IV

Can we move La-7 and J2M3 to BR IV since there is huge gap between BR V jets and BR IV props that in some nations are not even in the game so will be nice if we put some fighters in BR IV that have some chance against jets.


This aircrafts will never be good aircrafts at BR V since the 2 little rockets and the 2 little bombs are not BR V material and they will be too good for BR III so I think BR IV is the best place for them.

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters


JapanSeal

1 Like

I think they could both fit into BR3. The La-7 handles well but only 2 100kg bombs holds it back. The J2M3 also handles well but similarly only has the 2 rockets.

6 Likes

Well even if they put them to BR IV will be huge improvement since there is very few BR IV aircrafts. BR III many people will be against it since they have better performance then majority of BR III aircrafts only the spitfire is better.

But even then the Spitfire is a great example, it performs immaculately sure but its ground ordinance remains limited. The Spitfire could get moved to BR3 like a lot of people say but then the opportunity cost of the ordinance gets skewed because of the P-51D

1 Like

Don’t forget bf-109 G-14 that is almost identical to LA-7, but doesn’t have any bombs.

6 Likes

The Japanese rockets are NOT little whatsoever… please do your research before making such claims.

1 Like

:rofl: :joy: :rofl:

For BR V where you have 1000 kg bombs Explosive Mass
10 kg is equal to 269.9 kg ??? Go on explain me … xD

Please do all a favor and never type on that keyboard ever again before you say something even more stupid.

There is many more simply I made only about this 2 not to make too many on the same topic.

Yes

No
Please include data in future
Include separate polls this feels like a hostage taking
4 20 mm single engine what us plane compares

Slinging insults as response to a counter argument or observation is pretty childish, I’m also pretty sure it’s against the community guidelines please keep it civil.

1 Like

Then don’t say something stupid how a 10 kg explosive mass is a big rocket in Enlisted there is no real big rockets like Tiny Tim we have only small rockets in game. The Allies players sadly in Enlisted are the lowest IQ people for some reason. Specially the Xbox players play with them for a bit and you will know how fast you will move to another faction and you will stay as far away from them as possible since they are pure cancer.

Everything that is with explosive mass between 3 kg to 15 kg is a small rocket.

1 Like

Yesterday I played BR4 on Japan. It’s disgusting. I kept getting BR5. I really love Japan, but this thread is about another USSR AP. They have cuirasses, SVT40, and the disgusting Type4 against them. So I vote against.

1 Like

They gonna remove those at least.

3 Likes

I’m for transferring j2m3 to br4, but no la7.

3 Likes

You must give the allies something or they will start crying with some BS arguments xD You can see them in every topic they go and spam if you suggest some buff to axis or Japan but have no problem if they buff their faction xD

4 Likes

You say a lot of stupid shit too, like “the ki-100 is average”.

You’re just a punk at times. Need to work on that

The la7 is not better than any of japan br3-5 fighters

All of Japan’s br 4 and 5 fighters other than kikka and ki-84 should probably be downtiered

1 Like

Here we go :

cortisol-level
:rofl: :joy: :rofl:

Are you not busy spamming on the other topics then hijacking this one also about Ki-100 maybe you should start with the jets directly like a broken record on and on with same BS xD Go on tell us about F-80… xD
say-the-line-bart-simpsons

And they banned the Parrot so we can listen the Allies parrot xD :parrot: :parrot: :parrot: :us: :us: :us:

I thought the devs don’t care then you created a topic and they made it happen ? :rofl: :joy: :rofl:

2 Likes

I’m not denying that the amount it has as it’s not on par with the others… but they are very good and have a ton of HE

I guess not much different than the 190 A8… considering it has better turning with equal rockets

No, just calling you out for being an ass and a hypocrite.

Sure, why not? The f80 has better payload, but it’s maneuverability isn’t that much better. Pretty sure that’s not a wild take. It’s also not P2W, clearly you never did go look up the definition.

Now you can tell all these people how the ki-100 “sucks” and see what they think of that.