Is low velocity rockets more accurate then high velocity rockets ?
Come on its not music theory its just rocket science I understand you don’t have Phd in rocket science from Pyongyang from Kim Jong Un National Defense University like me but really its not that hard I know its a shocker but rocket velocity matters a lot…
As i said, it changes their flight behavior, but not damage. In real world.
What you’re talking about is artificially increasing it’s damage because it flies less good, or artificially increasing it’s velocity. That’s a fine argument, but you didn’t make that clear. Sounded like you were arguing against real world logic.
FYI the jap rockets have the most tnt out of all the rockets which you should know… ironic you bring up the velocity when it’s a direct result of its power.
Has nothing to do with this its bad design a Tiny Tim rocket moves with 885 km/h faster then 828 km/h and its a lot bigger rocket. Same way avangard missiles are better then U.S. LRHW (Dark Eagle) since literally reaches Mach 20 – Mach 27 and Avangard can carry a lot more payload and its much faster rocket.
The german rocket is on parr with it and it has a bit more velocity. I’m assuming the stats are just from real world data
So this is where things go dark for me. Is the jap rocket in game even able to carry more filler? Do we even know if the velocity stat it has in game is accurate? Do you have an actual historical fix or just saying it should go faster/do more damage for “balance”
30% is not exactly a bit more.
Well you have google why don’t you use it and check and you will come to the same conclusion that the German rocket is better…
Lmao. Wtf man? You’re the one saying it should be different. Aren’t you the one supposed to give this kind of information to begin with?
No to people like you I will give nothing I will let you talk shit until you do some work to check and then you will say nothing since im ‘‘keep downplaying them’’ and yet they are worse then BR III payload…
As this discussion keeps going further I’m thinking you’re not registering what I’m actually saying.
I’ve said japs should get double the rockets in high tier. I would think we’re on the same page for that?
I argued for real world logic, while you were arguing for game balance. We weren’t understanding each other there. I asked if there’s historical data showing the jap rockets can travel faster/carry more filler, because if so that’s a better argument for you in getting them buffed.
That’s not possible and has nothing to do with this topic its bunch of allies mains derailing the topic. Like you do on every other topic.
Why isn’t it possible? The planes can’t carry 4 rockets?
And how does it not have anything to do with this topic? Sure it does. We agree the overall payload sucks for br4/5.
Go on then find me J2M3 with 4 rockets…
Well you’re arguing for artificial velocity/damage increase, how is that any different than the plane getting 4 rockets? Some mechanic welding a couple more racks on is more plausible
You have abandoned reason for madness… If you wish we can directly give it Tiny Tim Rockets… or nuclear bomb?
Well i don’t know what the right answer is then. Can it also get a bomb with the rockets?
Its not N1K2-J there is many options there J2M3 has no such capabilities.
LOL historically it could never even hold 2 rockets.
So my solution is not anymore crazy than the plane with 2 rockets
Well then they can give it 60 kg bombs and move it to BR III. That’s even better.