Ka-Ho Japanese flame tank

Playing with a pz4 is like playing on console
Playing the 105mm Sherman is like playing on pc

I meant the Sherman player not the tank and you know it

So then the 105 Sherman would be easier to use, which contradicts your entire argument

That really doesn’t help clarify what you meant

Ahahahahahahahahaahahha
Ahahahhaahhahahaha
Wow so pc is better then console even with aim assist
Ahahahahhahahahah
Wow that just made it worth it

Ok I will be clear
Someone playing a 105mm Sherman
Against any br3 pz4
Has to be far more skilled
Or crazy lucky to win

If you loose to a 105mm Sherman
Using a br3 pz4

You a suck or are
Fighting a tanker god
Or that that 105mm tanker should buy a lotto ticket

I’m not saying it’s bad; yes, the 105mm Sherman is very powerful, but to reach a high level, you need to know how to use high-explosive shells and understand their effects on welded or cast armor, as well as many other factors. The 105mm’s armor is quite good. You can use sidescraping and other techniques that increase the chances of ricochets, but it’s not an easy vehicle to master when you’re starting out in tank hunting.

1 Like

Yes, playing on PC is much easier than playing on console even with aim assist.

But a 105 Sherman would have to be crazy lucky if they’re as bad as you, or they could just learn to shoot instead of expecting their shell to one shot everything just by hitting its target.

Very true, clearly overpressure is a bit of an obscure topic for the average Enlisted player. I should make a video going over everything there is to know about overpressure, I think that could help prevent the situation I find myself in.

1 Like

Wow expecting to one shot everything
You mean like using a pz4 against a Sherman
That can pen any part of a Sherman and by definition one shot it
Or kill the gunner
Reload before they can switch seat
Kill the gunner
Reload before they can switch seats
Rince and repeat

Again with all the pc players winning so players can play by themselves
And pc player calling aim assist the same thing as an aim bot

Fun fact: The 105 Sherman and the Panzer IV H are 2 different tanks. The Panzer IV H is objectively better for anti-tank while the 105 Sherman beats it in every other category, at the same time the 105 Sherman remains proficient in anti-tank.

Every part of that but the last part is true
If the pz4 has an a in at
The 105 has a c

I’ve already said that tank duels are often won by whoever shoots first, just like how it was in real life.

Also aim assist is only useful for bad players, and people who complain about it are the kinda PC players who get their teeth kicked in every match.

With any tank, you can destroy any other in a single hit. Look at me, I love annihilating H1 Tigers with a Stuart, and yet, on paper, I can’t even manage it! (I’m dodging them like crazy, so…)

1 Like

Name one br3 tank not Japanese and not a TD like the open top German tds that’s worse than the 105mm Sherman. Actually even some of the Japanese br3 tanks are better

Are you asking me to name a BR3 tank that’s worse than the 105 Sherman?

I am not saying it can’t happen
It has horrible pen, slow reload and only he shells
It’s not that the tank is bad
It’s just that almost every tank it faces is much better at killing tanks
Every tank can pen it from if not every point almost every point
If the 105 had any other shell
Ap aphe heat it be a decent tank killer

Yes ‘tank’ not tank destroyer
Preferably German
I know about the open top td German that can be killed by a stiff breeze

Don’t take this the wrong way, but while this may be true in real life, it’s not the case for Enlisted: striking first doesn’t guarantee victory; it’s primarily your knowledge and reflexes that increase your chances of survival and therefore of victory. :smile:

Well obviously, but in a case of 2 tankers with equal skill going again each other than it’s typically whoever placed their shot first who wins. It’s definitely not as pronounced in-game like you said, but if both tankers know how to aim then it comes down to who shoots first.

But the first shot comes down to reaction time, situation awareness, presence, positioning, game knowledge, etc. like you said, it’s more than just shooting first, but typically it all builds up to the first shot.

1 Like

I have no objections, I agree. :grin: