Here, it’s not about who complains more than whom. The point is that Italy is present, but it is not historically well represented. Important historical vehicles are missing, such as the L3/33 or the flamethrower tankette L3/35 LF. Iconic pistols like the Bodeo and the Glisenti are missing as well. The standard Italian anti-tank rifles are also absent, such as the Solothurn S-18/100 and the more powerful Solothurn S-18/1000, which was the most widely used version among Italian troops. Several iconic Italian units are either locked as premium content or are not present at all. The P26/40 already exists in War Thunder, so why not bring it into Enlisted at least to make the Italian ranks feel more alive? I also looked at the Italian tech tree in War Thunder, and it is full of vehicles. Even if they are not elite vehicles on the level of a Tiger I or a Tiger II, they still provide variety and historical depth. (If the P43 and its Bis and Ter variants had existed in reality, that would have been a different story.) What is really missing here are the foundations needed to make the Italian Royal Army fun to play, even as a sub-faction. If you notice, videogames always focus on the same four factions over and over again: the USA, the USSR, Germany, and Japan and even Japan is not always included. Why not try something different instead of repeating the same themes every time? Eventually people get tired of seeing the same things over and over. The game is good and very complete, but it is missing some essential foundations. For example, why haven’t they added British tanks like the Churchill? Let me know if you think I’m wrong.
Friend, you’re too impatient. All the weapons and vehicles will appear eventually; it’s just a matter of time. You can save your suggestions for the North African campaign anniversary, not during the Normandy landings anniversary period.
You know what, you’re right? I hadn’t thought about it, but moving forward by discussing it might help.
My friend, haste makes waste.
It definitely should. And it definitely will be.
California Highschool level analisys.
THANK YOU! The same points they use about Italy about needing big bro Germany can be said about UK needing America.
Both italy and germany need italy to be a separate faction
Italy is different . They can be in most of campaign unlike china . In africa , stalingrad , Berlin .
Sorry, friend, I’m torn between calling you an idiot and ignorant or letting you get lost in your ignorance…
I see you cannot refute my observation.
And yet I tell you that’s not the case. So, my dear ignorant, the Royal Italian Army, despite its technological shortcomings and everything else, has demonstrated that its soldiers, when motivated, are more combative than the Germans, Americans, and British. There is documented evidence to prove this, such as the battles of El-Alamein, El-Agheila, during the landing in Gela where the “Livorno” Infantry Division almost drove the Americans back into the sea with courage and obsolete Renoult R35 and were driven back into the sea only thanks to the intervention of the US Navy cannons also because Patton had already considered having the documents destroyed and the troops re-embarked. As for the British Army, I don’t have to give any explanation because they fought against two nations, holding them at bay and starting an advance even before the Americans arrived. My dear friend, I invite you to open some books before making certain statements!
I can keep arguing with you all day because unlike you I inform myself while you speak with the usual stereotypes.
And in any case, if the game introduced EP and EPS (Ready Effect and Special Ready Effect) ammunition on Italian vehicles, an M41 75/32 would be enough to take down an initial Sherman head-on. Before giving banal answers, find out what these ammunitions are. At this point those vehicles would be raised in Tier and I would not like to know what would happen if the M43 105/25 Bassotto with this ammunition was inserted, even the Soviet tanks would end up pierced through and through