It is time to address nerfing or doing something to Body Armor

Surely in the 90 percent of ppl who want body armor fixed someone in there is a normal player… statistically speaking

3 Likes

Yeah, I just don’t get the doublethink.

On the one hand, it should stay because it’s a “unique faction feature” and “the game is asymetrical”.

On the other, “the difference is bordering on the irrelevant”, and “people just don’t feel the benefits or drawbacks of it, it’s all just imagined”.

Both statements can’t be true at the same time…?

Square this circle, anyone…

4 Likes

Armours are cringe, so I don’t use them on my mustard hat men.

Yes they’re a good advantage to have, with no downside.

But I don’t need this kind of crutch.

“Afterall, they don’t change anything”.

4 Likes

they change a lot, they defo eat more bullets than they otherwise would, but u are above the meta fine sir, and for this u have my respect

1 Like

Your statistics are wrong, just like the whole saboteurs votes. You all represent a tiny fraction of players in this game.

Can you show me this other fraction out of curiosity?

1 Like

In a fair match with both sides having good players - I absolutely do lose matches because of it - albeit mostly BR1 and BR2 specifically, BR4 and BR5 matches German weapons have high enough damage output that armor only effects guns at longer ranges.

Take a MP40 into BR5 and tell me you dont feel a difference in time to kill - its also just miliseconds.

2 Likes

The “don’t care about body armor” secret society is living in our walls everyone! They outnumber us 10 to 1 but have no mouth piece except the glorious @TJLockie-live

1 Like

It’s because they are not.

Most vocal defenders of those already sunk a lot of ressources in acquiring them.

Those who are honest, like @Deus_Vult88 up there, admitted it, and even proposed a sensible solution.

Then there’s the other hypocrites who will attack you personally instead of being civil (while having a fully armoured team).

You can judge :person_shrugging:

4 Likes

The difference between TTK with an MP40 in BR 5 is because of the low fire rate :rofl: of course it’s going to be different when you’re up against weapons with 1000+ rpm what even is this logic??

Holy airball….

1 Like

What do you mean?!?

It doesn’t change anything!!!

1 Like

The projection is real with you. Done replying to your slop arguments.

So whenever something with a slow rof…. Say a semi auto…. Now has double the shots required to kill…. Does it kill slower?

1 Like

Pretty sure PPS43 has higher RPM than STG44.

while I do agree, in what world would u bring a BR2 weapon into BR5

u are kinda just asking for ur squad to be wiped in this situation

1 Like

Yes clearly I’m coping by imagining some silent majority support my opinion that doesn’t participate at all in any discussions about the game. Wait Nvmd u did that

1 Like

The STG has higher damage :rofl:

Wow, exactly my point mate

Yes! Higher dmg means kill faster!!! And body armor lowers damage…. Therefore……

1 Like