You have no idea, milli seconds obviously matter, its the difference between a BR1 SMG and a BR3 SMG
5 Likes
My point proven 
all I’m hearing is slop excuses one after the other. To save the moderators the hassle, I’m not even going to bother. Have fun letting body armour haunt you in your dreams.
Wait but tell me why can’t Russian guns dmg be halfed if that ttk difference doesn’t matter at all? Also if body armor difference doesn’t matter why do you care so much about keeping it?
2 Likes
I couldn’t give a shit if it was removed I’m tired of seeing the whole argument every time I get on here. It’s pathetic watching you all come up with excuses.
A Sten Mk II with the same damage as a regular 9mm gun would be BR II. A 0.2 damage difference can mean the world.
On a side-note, I do still love that the guy who doesn’t care about the topic is so invested in it.
4 Likes
Can mean the world he says if that means the world to you then you need better priorities
Invested? It’s literally second hand embarrassment for you all
So in other words:
Body armor has no impact - so dont change it
also body armor needs to stay - because faction balance isnt symmetrical
You sir have no argument at all, this is all illogical nonsense. The only thing you said is that I have somehow skill issue. Dont expect me to take you serious.
6 Likes
Are you denying that the Sten Mk II wouldn’t need to be uptiered if it had 6.8 instead of its current 6.6 damage, or are you just trolling as always…?
3 Likes
We dont come up with excuses, its the same complaint for years now. If we would be coming up with excuses we would find new ways to be biased - but its always body armor because its literally obviously the root issue.
1 Like
I couldn’t care less about 0.2 damage
Bro doesn’t understand thresholds. Mods u sure he isn’t trolling?
2 Likes
Right, your takes on balance is garbage then…
2 Likes
Don’t worry, nobody is taking anyone with this argument seriously. They haven’t after the first post and they won’t after the 100th.
“Everyone else is wrong I’m right”
1 Like
My takes on balancing micro seconds is that it is irrelevant
The fact that 80% of total votes for the past 10 times body armor was voted on see it as an issue proofs your statement to be false.
1 Like
What is very interesting that we see in this armour debate,
Every. Single. Time.
Is that those who defend their existence:
- say that it somehow doesn’t change anything (even if statistics proved otherwise countless times)
- decked most of their soldiers in said armours that change nothing, wasting thousands of green cards and gold in the process.
So. “It doesn’t change anything but I’ll still invest a fortune giving all my men that ugly look. If you’re again me, skill issues!” (Even if it changes nothing and as such, skills shouldn’t be a variable.)
Anyway.
I’m just disappointed in devs for doing nothing and letting yet another issue fester.
5 Likes
That’s why it’s so embarrassing for you all. You’ve all convinced yourselves that body armour is the reason you lose games. When in fact no normal player can tell the difference or cares enough to change it.
ngl if i was a redparrot, the meta currently is using body armor, so i would also deck ALL my boys in it. I am GER main so eh
Every soviet team I play against do the same, ngl it is a bit annoying
2 Likes