ISU 152? Why not?

Yes people here have talked about this vehicles potential short commings (long reload particularly), but adding it in BR 4 isnt terrible of an idea - yes we already have a KV2 in BR3 which is essentially having the same shortcomings - BUT apparently it can use a HEAT round with insane 250mm of penetration!

90mm of just slightly angled armor is “okay” for a BR4 vehicle,

being a SPG and having a very poor reload speed should justify it having a massively powerful gun,

also it could mount a dshk heavy MG like IS2.

I personally think every nation in every BR should get access to some tank destroyer that has it easier to destroy heavy tanks when getting up tiered.

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
3 Likes

tbh, the isu 152 has a DSHK just like the is2 etc, so I would put it at br4/5.

also, if this is getting added i see no reason why the Jagdtiger shouldnt be introduced

2 Likes

That’s post-war ammunition of what it is

2 Likes

Oh really? Thats bad.

Well no, just means we can have it at lower BR

Tons of ISU / SU threads have been posted if one searches

3 Likes

Jagdtiger is OP, dont ever mention it.

Again ISU 152 has just slightly angled 90mm of armor - Panzer IV can pen that.

Jagdtiger has 250mm of armor. This shouldn’t be up for debate at all.

2 Likes

They are crazy iconic, it really makes no sense why they are still missing from the game.

4 Likes