exactly, it’s as it should be
Is it a century-old problem to fix the issue of vehicles getting stuck in trenches and bomb craters?
1 Like
YOu need to chill the fck out dude, more spassed out than I am ^^
I would LOVE to see Enlisted Cold War, but with a clear cut off WW2 and Cold War equipment and Maps ofc
Historically, the battlefields of World War I were like this. While the British Mark heavy tanks could traverse trenches and craters with wide angles, the French Saint-Chamont tanks and the German A7V tanks could not. This is an accurate historical account of World War I, not a game bug. In such a situation, you would have to abandon the vehicle and have the tank crew advance as infantry. Furthermore, your argument is very immature, and you’re emphasizing vehicles rather than their function. No one except War Thunder players would make such a foolish improvement request. Also, if you spend money in War Thunder but it’s counted as Enlisted spending, the official War Thunder operator won’t recognize it; only the War Thunder operator would support your claims.
It’s really exhausting to have conversations with people like you. I told you I’m not a player of War Thunder, but you insisted on treating me as a War Thunder player and causing trouble. You even zeroed out the money I spent on the game. This really made me laugh. If you didn’t engage in the game discrimination chain, you wouldn’t be able to speak properly?
I originally regarded you as a normal player and discussed game-related issues with you. However, in other posts, I kept seeing you claiming that War Thunder players are just here to cause trouble. It seems that other gamers, with their free time, come to play a game they don’t like and then post comments. Now, I have changed my mind about you.
No, if you’ve spent a lot of money, you should post screenshots to prove it. After all, words alone aren’t enough. Besides, Enlisted does have many “armchair gamers” who come from War Thunder; they don’t know WWII history and aren’t interested in it. They just want Enlisted to become another War Thunder infantry mode. Finally, if you feel Enlisted’s WWI history mode isn’t for you, then unfortunately, this game might not be the kind of Western fast-paced, low-quality game you prefer. I’ve encountered the same issues you’ve raised in event mode, but it’s irrelevant. Because if a tank gets stuck in a shell crater or trench, you have to abandon it and let the tank crew become infantry for attack or defense, instead of you armchair gamers who don’t even know the historical context complaining about how bad the game is!
Then you’re just one of the minority. War Thunder initially claimed to be a WWII game, but look at it now. There’s a reason some players who enjoy WWII history games abandoned it. It’s the same principle as not letting someone who doesn’t understand military history develop a serious military game. Look at World of Tanks; it also claimed to be a WWII game, but now it’s become a sci-fi Cold War tank game. Call of Duty also claimed to be a WWII game, but after Call of Duty 18 came out, Western gender politics, Japanese people speaking English, and fictional WWII weapons all appeared. I’m not drunk; I’m very clear-headed. This is Enlisted’s bottom line. Crossing this line is equivalent to a clone of War Thunder.
Cold War weapons and vehicles aren’t in Tier 5 matchmaking, are they? Are there AK-47s or M48 heavy tanks? The jet fighter version is just for balance, allowing Allied and Axis powers to use the same fighters. Does this count as the Cold War? If you like War Thunder’s Cold War mode, that’s fine. Please go back to the War Thunder forums and offer valuable suggestions for their infantry mode development, instead of discussing Enlisted’s “War of Tomorrow” here. Enlisted’s “War of Tomorrow” is World War I, not the Cold War. Furthermore, if Enlisted were to make all nations develop according to WWII history, the completeness of the weapon tech tree would be greatly compromised. Some WWII experimental weapons were added to the tech tree to maintain game balance, and most of them were developed before 1945.
No, only planes from 1946 and as all historians know, WW2 took place in 1946 as well. Or the infamous Silenced PPSh where it still not only remains unknown if it even existed but also if it was even developed during WW2. Or the wood tank which I think wasnt even build as mock up by Japan, but by the US.
So like COD or War Thunder?
Which just further undermines your entire premise of history and WW2. Not sure how much WW2 feeling you will get with the Type Hei Auto.
What a high bar, also like the part with “most”.
Because WW2 feeling can also exist with stuff that was developed after 1945 since historians know that WW2 also took part in 1946 A.D.
Alright, you know absolutely nothing about military history, and I’m pretty sure you’re a War Thunder player. Someone who doesn’t even know when World War II happened is saying it continued into 1946. Right, right, the Axis powers all surrendered in 1945, so the Allies were fighting aliens in World War II, right? I don’t want to talk to a military history idiot; it’s a huge waste of time. And judging by your appearance, you’re a student, and not even very good at history. Go look up some history on Wikipedia—what happened between 1939 and 1945—and then you can answer me whether 1946 was still a continuation of World War II.
I guess someone here really doesnt understand the art of sarcasm and takes things too literally.
Unless this is next level sarcasm from your side. In that case, cool I guess.
I’m too lazy to discuss history with you, a game historian who possesses a binary thinking and cannot comprehend human language. Spending even a second more talking to you is a waste of time. It’s not me who’s ruining this game, but people like you who maintain an inexplicable sense of cheap superiority and constantly exclude other players. Speaking of which, I almost feel sorry for you. Normally, the higher one’s knowledge, the better one’s attitude. But you seem to have it the other way around
Where are your screenshots of spending real money? A War Thunder player who hasn’t even spent any money is bragging on the Enlisted forums about how much they care about the game’s development. I think you’re a habitual liar, deliberately changing the subject. It’s just a new account, and you’re even deliberately mocking how bad the WWI event mode is. Go back to War Thunder; Enlisted doesn’t need low-quality trash players like you.
I don’t need your sarcasm or criticism. If you don’t like Enlisted, then don’t complain on the Enlisted forums. I’ve already made it very clear: this game is based on WWII history, secondly on game data balance, and lastly on reasonable modification suggestions, not on your understanding of War Thunder, understand?
Well, why replying in the first place?
Whats the point of the forum then?
I thought you didnt need my validation?
Dude, just ignore this person. The more you argue with him, the more excited he gets, and it ruins your mood. He can’t even understand a meme, so don’t expect him to understand other people’s words
You two are the same kind of people, so troublemakers, leave the Enlisted forum. We don’t need your bad advice and ignorant arguments; you are very unwelcome!
Not even I can tell myself I care enough to have a go with this guy… he’s just too much out there… 
facepalm idd
This M59 dude is way worse than Decard ever was.