Kikka is the worst Jet and it has very limited ammo will fit the ground attacker role perfectly since it was a ground attacker plane.
The Fw D-12 is played in combination with Jabo thats the best setup for Germany and for US is P-47 with Meteor since in this combinations you can help each other with the Ju-188 how you gonna help your teammate. The Ju-188 is used more for single playing people that dont provide much team play. if 2 planes focus on you without a wing mate you are done. The ability of the US faction to have fighters in ground attacker category always been unbalanced. So the devs did the same for Japan. The only problem is will they give the Ki-83 BR III or BR IV payload.
Iâll be honest with you.
Meteor is strong?
Just hit it first and itâs over.
In the case of 30mm, it is destroyed immediately even if get hit by a single bullet.
Thatâs why, frankly, itâs the most important thing to just hit first in air and air.
I havenât loose that many enemies to Meteor in a Kikka.
Itâs a game where can see the lead indicator, so itâs easy to hit, and technique is important to seek and hit first.
Also, in the case of the Pacific Ocean, there is an option of escape thanks to the aircraft carrier, so it is good to use.
Meteor is the strongest Jet in game. Since it has the best payload and very good performance much better then the Kikka and it has much more rounds then the Kikka hope you are not suggesting that Kikka is better then the Meteor since thats very allies bias statement.
Which benefits boom and zoom planes that Allies are full with. The Allies have much more payloads then the Axis which allow them to make much more kills and when it comes to performance they also have the upper hand and lets not go to premiums since they are the only faction that can combine 2 jets
I can be sure of one thing.
If this game was War Thunder, I would have Good the Meteor, but on Enlisted, Itâs Good the Me262 or the Kikka better than the Meteor.
This is possible because of the lead indicator.
It is also the difference in the presence or absence of infantry.
The reason why the Meteor is okay with 2 bombs is because the cannon gun is 20mm, and there is almost no infantry killing force like 30mm.
If the Meteor had a 30mm HE shell
I would have told to nerf Meteor too.
Thatâs not serious as I said if its up to the allies they should be just victory screen when you pick the allies faction and lose screen if you pick the Axis. Make a little poll is the Kikka or the Meteor better plane and see what people vote. Also you are not taking to account that normally the Japan vs US air battles are 1 plane vs 2 and most of the times US planes have much better payloads. So guess whoâs gonna have more kills?
To be honest
I only do Random Queue with BR5 for all the Factions, but I get at least 80% win rate.
Of course, if play Squad, it goes up to at least 95%.
Itâs a player issue, and the issue with BR5 right now is the absence of Japanese high performance attackers and the Soviet Unionâs T-44-100 and here too. (Still, the high winning percentage of the Soviet Union and Japan⌠is largely due to RMN-50 and Arisaka Mortar. wwww these two are obviously OP weapons used in BR5 as well. Of course, even without it, the winning rate is high.)
But BR5 has better balance compared to lower BR. (BR2~4 have more balance issues than BR5.)
While the MK 108 can miss by almost 4,5 m and still hit infantry the Type 5 can at most reach 2,5 m with its frag.
The HE blast radius of the german HEI is even larger than the largest fragmentation max radius for japan which says a lot about the quality of the shell.
So unless the new HE is buffed compared to the Kikka it wont be nearly as effective compared to the german 30mm.
Oh so your win rate is 150%?
Itâs really funny.
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
I speak based on the data used in the actual game.
Youâre lying
Honestly, I can destroy all the tanks with 100kg, but thatâs why I thought of it as BR4.
If change it to 250kg, BR5 is correct.
There is not only a bomb in determining BR.
You have to look at the whole thing.
If it was, the P-47D-28 and Fw 190D-12 would be BR3~4, not BR5.
But no one complains. Why?
Because these are the things that should actually be in BR5.
and XA-38âs too
Itâs BR3, but honestly considering the planeâs performance and overall armament, itâs right for this one to move to BR4 tooâŚ
Should I be honest?
Youâre just a CLOWN trying to behave like a Japanese.
The point is
I saw the data you brought. (Because everything I mention is based on that)
Of course, itâs based on that
It doesnât change my mind.
Type 5 is better to use than Mk 108.
Velocity is also a number that cannot be ignored.
Especially in the battle between jets.
This is because this difference has a strong influence on hitting the enemyâs moving plane.
This advantage makes it a little easier for Kikka to hit enemy planes at greater distances than Me262.
I donât judge one thing, I judge it as a whole.
Iâm consider what shell bands this gun uses, how much power and penetration it has, and what velocity it has.
From that point of view, I rate Type 5 better than MK108.
Oh, of course, itâs definitely a shit for Kikka to have only 100 shells.
But the cannon itself is excellent.
So what Iâm trying to say is the minimum radius of 2m and a lot of fragments (this number of fragments is actually more important than the radius. Because of this, there are quite a few cases where no amount of fragments, no matter how wide it is, will die if they are small amount)
Most of the fragments are prone to disappearing.
But this is a small advantage and a strong advantage is Velocity.
