how the fuck you can compare weapons to playerbase " issues " ?
you’re twisting things on your own.
perhaps for your own sake and my time, you should stop that.
because no reasonable person can even justify or explain you questioning me of facing only bots, and when i tell you that i play in lone fighters, it turns into an mp28 vs drums and then back to population issues.
i suppose you just wanted to throw it in because of " stats ".
go praise robihn or something?
i didn’t even mention the playerbase in this thread.
i’m more of a “don’t fix what ain’t broken”.
type of idea.
and over 3 years seeing people that want exactly his own team to crush the enemy with no effort, or the exact same weapons of the enemies for his own team, one might want to be reasonable about it, and push out idiocy ideas.
i can guarantee you, feelings, stats non stats, doesn’t give a shit as long you get the job done with the tools that you have been given.
which they don’t have to be the same bloody thing.
otherwise what’s the fucking point of asymetrical balance.
the thing you are in favor for.
and the thing this game is based upon.
so the issue is… who’s at fault. the game for not listening the new players or those who complains while using innappropriately their weapon,
or the actual player for expecting something where it shouldn’t be, nor really was designed to be in the first place.
he would have loved the pacific bar becoming an infantry weapon though.
( that is, expressing it openly while accusing everyone else of being those funny windmills related people )
good times…
ricky should still be in touch with the man.
( and plays regularly with him if not mistaken. at least, that’s what he said the last time )
I am still confused, is there anyone willing to test this thing out? If it is a 10% total damage reduction, it should be able to prevent a one hit kill for some rifles IF combined with the 35 HP vitality perk + the extra vitality of paratroopers and flamers.
Well yeah, but again, I don’t know what to think anymore… there is too much contradicting information about this.
What we would need is someone willing to try out rifles against soldiers with only armor, then with armor and vitality, and then armor vitality + extra vitality of paratroopers.
From just guessing we would break effectively the HP wall of 15 - which should absolutely make you survive one shot from many different rifles.
Side A has better weapons than Side B. Why joining side B?
And mains usually tend to go to the campaign where their side has better stuff.
Which is why the Germans hang around in Normandy and now in Berlin, the Allies in Tunisia and Normandy and the Soviets mostly in Moscow and SG.
Its a general issue based on poor weapon (stat) balance (most of the time). This has nothing to do with lf experierence which doesnt reflect reality of the actual servers.
Yes. Im really sorry that I dont put my personal feelings before numbers because I ddidnt spent the last two years in custom battles.
Yeah because everything is nice in lf I guess.
Whats the point of balance at all if you counter it with my expierence anyways?
And so far, balance is based on stats the devs give guns and tanks and vehicles. If the stats sucks, players dont use it outside your lf servers.
Well. The game is hard bleeding outside of lf cb battles so I dont know… I would rather listen to newbies than to people that play one side all the time or in custom battle.
Especially since numbers are kinda easier to track than individual expierence.
except that said main ( if we talking about parrots case ) he plays berlin, have almost everything unlocked and still complains about the russians.
which he is not the only one.
i’m not a main, and no one actually should be.
because trying both factions gives you an idea of what you are dealing with and what both factions has to overcome shortcomings.
the reason why soviets are better, are not behind weapons.
but better and actually intelligent players if that’s what you want me to say.
no wonders why they win ( or at least, used to )
how the fuck did you come out with such conclusion based one:
to this?
nothing checks out.
i wonder what clicked in your head and said " yeah! let’s send it ".
you sure are.
also, that’s kinda an onverstatement.
and as usual, speaking out from your own ass today.
nice.
better than the dystopian hell-scape someone else wants to create because things is not equal to what the counter part has.
unless you’re one of those delusion persons
you should see that too.
and you should still know better.
and you call what we have balance?
i mean, it’s called asymetrical balance, but i’m starting to doubt wheather you and the rest actually understand what the fucks that means so,
i’ll let someone else do the talking:
but i don’t see what’s the issue of a weapon that someone decide to use it.
if you want to use it, do it. if not, that’s up to you.
no " balance " or " less use " concept is there.
what, should we make every low tier weapons some sort of lasers?
and if you want to turn this game even more arcade to appeal and please casuals that won’t stick around because most of them aren’t really interested to begin with, ( or are looking for something entirely different from enlisted )
you’re welcome.
but as long this blondie still has an opinion, ( which, btw doesn’t look like i’m the only one with the same opinions ) i will oppose it.
Like what?
T34/85 vs Pz IV J?
Pz III N vs T34?
The existence of T50?
The KV1?
The fact the 47mm can one shot most german tank in Moscow from the front?
And what US has comparable with Soviet? The best they have is legit the premium tank soviet has in Berlin lmao
