what you have just spouted is actually nonsense.
normandy is the primal examples.
equipment is not the same. nor really that balanced
do you even play this game?
soviets have some of the worst tanks and airplanes in the game.
“”“we”" got king tigers, Fws with almost more effective payload and actual good fighters.
soviets got same tank with almost same weapons with the exception of the IS-2, which it’s unironically bad. ( the 44 varient it’s somewhat better, but the long reload didn’t changed )
you’re putting your self at disadvantage because the shell doesn’t work and the armor can be penned even by a panzer IV. ( i mean, hey, it’s an is2. it’s relatively great for immersion )
but it really doesn’t have much going for it.
soviets in the weapons compartment have most drums with shit ton of dispersion and longer reload times.
not to mention, soviets bolties are worse. as they don’t have many to begin with.
in berlin, as an axis player, you barely lack anything.
not gonna victim blaming, but if you find that to be an issue, and you keep doing the same thing with the same weapons getting the same results, look inward.
the smgs are not the problem.
i can tell you that much
as for op, if you really find that to be too much of an advantage, how about you ask for a speed reduction when using that said armor? that would have been much better and logical rather than crying for out loud.