If the Soviets can have magical body armor and be able to reload explosives and the magical World War One weapon when can the Germans expect their own magical stuff And this is for end game

POV:you got the whole squad typing
Screenshot_20231103_153759_edit_1745149273322247

5 Likes

Oh god is THAT what you were whining about?!
German and Slav end game are nearly 1:1 and if you think otherwise you’re the fucking goofiest goober I’ve ever seen

5 Likes

Well. Best bet is MP717 and I think people love it more than they do the MP family.

Tunisia is different. I mean, Allied SMG suck / perform weird for their supposed level excluding the Thompson M1921 and the Lanchester and maybe drum Thompson.

Against Soviet drums, most likely. Against Western SMGs, not really.

Well. Consider the awful bipod stats and ads penalty of MGs, I would say its not the same, only saved by their better dmg.
Just use Kiraley or StG family. Better dmg, better control, better accuracy and no ads penalty and its still the same “class”.

1 Like

The problem is that they are completely blindsided, just pure bait and attention seeking at this point.

Axis germany will have the largest pool of vehicles to choose from, weapons from italy and also have access to WP grenades, impact grenades and 2 event paratrooper squads all of which the Soviets dont have.

He is just baiting reactions from people, nothing else.

That is it from me on this thread.

3 Likes

You’re really not giving MP-40s, MAB-38s, and MP-38s enough credit because they’re still great contenders even up against Soviet drum weapons if you aim well enough to hit torsos reliably

I don’t like the Tunis drum thompson
It does this weird swirl while firing
While the Thompson 100 on the Para goes pretty much straight up
:crazy_face:

so uncivilized.

w
h
a
t
?

lancasters, grizzies, and thomsons you call them bad?

no if you can aim for the head.

and keep your goddamn distance.

i’d say mgs are almost more effective than smgs.

1 Like

Its M1928A1 with drum. Tbh I would pick it over a Kiraley or StG anytime. A drum M1921 would be dope though.

“Excluding”. What is “grizzie” though?

Thats lame. You can also use Nagant and aim for headies. Still, I wouldnt call the Nagant a good weapon, let alone superior to anything.

I just stick with the M1A1 across all American campaigns
Its the most reliable and least spastic with recoil

1 Like

Thompson M1A1 has brand awareness otherwise I would stick with M50s and maybe M3Gs.

6kmt0g

9 Likes

but those are precisely INCLUDED.

since you only have the sten and few others that i’m missing.

which are no where near good.

with merge, we’ll have the austen, the other aussie smg, and m50 reising.

that m50 it’s like an mp40 but on steroid ( perhaps i’m bias and i really like that m50 )

if you put your self in a position to easily get squad killed in one burst, who’s fault is that.

the guy using an smgs expecting to somehow out gun the enemy that has more bullets, or the same guy standing in his line of fire ( expecting to do the same as the guy about to waste you & your squad ).

you can’t compare carrots with potatoes and expect them to work the same way.

come on now.

you have to use your own equipment accordingly.

or gamble and take the risk by going " yolo ".

which… war it’s not really about " yolo " but methodically use the tools been given at best in their intended situations.

such as, putting something between you and the enemy.

use cover or make one and engage from the ideal situations.

now, if you bring out my replays, my entire gameplay is based on the yolo system.
which often results in do as i say, not as i do.

but, the key difference, i don’t complain about the opposition when i die if i played badly my own cards.

1 Like

Paratroopers

USSR - :x:
GER - :white_check_mark: (x3)
US - :white_check_mark: (x4)

Riders

USSR - :x:
GER - :white_check_mark: (x2)
US - :white_check_mark: (x2)

Heavy Mortars

USSR - :white_check_mark: (80 mm)
GER - :white_check_mark: (80 mm)
US - :x:

Ampulomet

USSR - :white_check_mark:
GER - :white_check_mark:
US - :x:

Impact Grenades
USSR - :x:
GER - :white_check_mark:
US - :white_check_mark:

White Phosphorus Grenades
USSR - :x:
GER - :white_check_mark:
US - :white_check_mark:

High-pen Projectile Launchers

USSR - :white_check_mark: (Panzerfaust 100, 220 mm)
GER - :white_check_mark: (Panzerfaust 100, 220 mm)
US - :x: (M9 Bazooka, 102 mm)

Anti-aircraft vehicles (edit: with anti-aircraft cannons)

USSR - :white_check_mark: (GAZ)
GER - :white_check_mark: (Flakpanzer)
US - :x:

Germany unfairly treated …

7 Likes

:nerd_face: :point_up: they have the m2 ( were events mortars )

3 Likes

I dont see what is so hard to understand here.
Its basically except.

And we are going beyond Tunisia now?
Well. M50 is better than most Thompsons and Owen is Lanchester with weird iron sight and more rof.

Thats not the point.
You can aim with anything that shoots bullets to the head. That doesnt make a gun good or bad.

Im not going down the anacedote hole. Thats why we have stats so we dont need anecdotes anymore.

And Im pretty sure that in war you also dont yolo around with flamethrowers and paratrooper rifles while you are a SS unit.

M13?

M2? Edit: Nevermind.

2 Likes

Only 60 mm!

M2 is light mortar I believe, 60mm

1 Like

M13, true. Was thinking about vehicles with anti-aircraft cannons (flakpanzer and GAZ)

3 Likes

Fair enough.