It definitely shouldn’t. It would be obscene for every soldier to have AT weapon. Not to mention, there would no reason to ever equip normal pistol again.
The only issue I see is that this would basically make APCs and lower tiered tanks really really weak and unuseable at their own B.R if every soldier can basically have a pocket AT.
The only point here that has any amount of validity is the Soviet body armour (the hell does “murrican rocket shower” even mean, neither rocket artillery call-ins nor rocket equipped vehicles are a US exclusive) and even then that’s a smaller degree of factional asymmetry, like it “only” reduces body shot damage by like 10% as opposed to giving them a unique ability to do something, like allowing all troops to carry an explosive AT launcher in an arguably not that important slot.
It is weird however, that when the Soviets get some exclusive feature it’s (rightfully) an outrage but simultaneously the idea that the Germans get their own exclusive ability is perfectly fine for you people.
The hell are you going on about, this has nothing to do with what I said.
Well US and Germany practically have no BR1 AT weapon.
Those single shot AT rifles are terrible.
And since BR2 for bolt action gameplay is kinda ruined because of all the BR2 powercreep (too good SMGs and semis) - if you want boltaction gameplay you need BR1