I hope to change the "assault pistol" from Germany to the position of a standard pistol. Rather than the position of the secondary weapon

I hope to change the “assault pistol” from Germany to the position of a standard pistol.
Rather than the position of the secondary weapon

The assault pistol in Germany should be a standard pistol, not some kind of anti-tank auxiliary weapon.
It can be used as a handgun.

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
2 Likes

It definitely shouldn’t. It would be obscene for every soldier to have AT weapon. Not to mention, there would no reason to ever equip normal pistol again.

4 Likes

like detpacks & tnt aint a thing already ?

Except the fact that sturm is quite obsolete past BR2

Yeah, because the AT weapon definitely only has one use(/shot), just like TNT or EP.

Stop trying to be intellectually dishonest.

Because ability to snipe APCs isn’t valuable at all. And it’s comparable to anything any other handgun can do.


Just one little trick

Gorillas can by default take more tnt with them cant they ?

You can take grenade pouch if you feel slightly uncomfortable with just 1 tnt

How many TNT’s & Detpacks you exactly expect to need / tank ? Considering most of squads have more than 1 soldier

Dunno, my GRB’s seems to go just thru APC’s most of time id guess the sturm aint any better on that department.

3 Likes

The only issue I see is that this would basically make APCs and lower tiered tanks really really weak and unuseable at their own B.R if every soldier can basically have a pocket AT.

Unless you plan on giving everyone else the ability to carry AT weapons in the handgun slot this is completely unfair.

Oh wow, a weapon is obsolete when you use it at a higher BR than it is meant to?

Like the murrican rocket shower or soviet bodyarmor ?

Takes bit imagination to pretend its OP at low BR where sovjets fks around with bodyarmor, murricans with P38’s & tommys.

The only point here that has any amount of validity is the Soviet body armour (the hell does “murrican rocket shower” even mean, neither rocket artillery call-ins nor rocket equipped vehicles are a US exclusive) and even then that’s a smaller degree of factional asymmetry, like it “only” reduces body shot damage by like 10% as opposed to giving them a unique ability to do something, like allowing all troops to carry an explosive AT launcher in an arguably not that important slot.

It is weird however, that when the Soviets get some exclusive feature it’s (rightfully) an outrage but simultaneously the idea that the Germans get their own exclusive ability is perfectly fine for you people.

The hell are you going on about, this has nothing to do with what I said.

Cant really remember any planes armed with rockets at low BR for GE.

I can quite confidentally say that bodyarmor is by far more useful.
Its passive, you wont have to do shit and it reduces incoming dmg by 10%.

Pretty sure you get shot at quite more often than you get to use this AT.

They still have it so no reason to not give others something as well.

Well then nerf its accuracy, its ammo, its penetration and its post pen damage - and move it to BR1.

More obsolete shit to GE br 1-2 is exactly what this game needs.

Well US and Germany practically have no BR1 AT weapon.

Those single shot AT rifles are terrible.

And since BR2 for bolt action gameplay is kinda ruined because of all the BR2 powercreep (too good SMGs and semis) - if you want boltaction gameplay you need BR1