Not as long as WT only has one shell for it.
One could only imagine the amount that has been racked in, yet only place i see where they have put some, effort has been Normandy, maybe they did Moscow/Belin nice too, idk.
but rest are pretty shonky, and almost has one thinking, maybe they put all that money they make, in to buying them selves Ferrari/BMW/Maserati, powdering there noses, and buying real estate??, as i donāt see how game is still broken, with so much investment from , so called whales.(no offence ment) just what peeeps refer to you as.
well idk exact implementation. someone mentioned loadouts and keo said he will pass it to dev team, so we may be getting easy way to change preset loadouts.
some factions being locked to certain campaigns is necessity for historical purposes. you cant have japanese in normandy or africa. what is gained in this update is that german playerbase will be more flexible in 5 campaign MM, soviet playerbase more flexible in 3 campaign MM and western allies/us in 3 campaign MM depending on equipped weapon. minor factions will probably be locked to certain campaigns and will probably be mixed with their major axis or allies counterpart.
so yeah it will be more flexible.
Lets be honest, sole reason is that Japan is shit.
If people didnt want to play Africa, they will either try to avoid the shit out of it or have to play it even if they dont want.
10/10.
Thats what people wanted I guess. Being forced to play sth. they dont want because the devs are lazy.
Except they can total bring less stuff to battles, need to readjust everything if they wanna switch timeline, cant even do much if they play Italy or Japan, can bring even less premiums to battle because now they are all over and still uselessā¦
flexible I guess.
personally i would include opt out function for certain campaigns/modes (asked that question for Q&A, so i hope i will get an answer). i would make it work like this: if none of the current MM for his rating/side is being matched for campaign/mode that player doesnt want to play, player will wait in line for next queue that will be made according to campaign/mode that player actually wants to play. so instead of having parallel queues that would split playerbase, i would put them in series (queue for MM queue). i would issue warning that MM can take longer cause of such actions.
like i said if you have preset loadouts this can easily be fixed. press one button and it loads you moscow squads, press another and it loads you berlin late war squad.
overall for now there is too much guesswork on how thing may or may not work including yours and mine ideas. i would wait for Q&A till questions are actually answered and we get clearer picture.
If you already being selective with presets and queues whatever, you could also just leave it as it is.
Really, just merge the two last populated campaigns Berlin and Normandy.
preset for moscow squad could easily bring you to moscow or stalingrad, or maybe even in berlin. it more or less just makes it easier to equip different weapon loadouts with which you want to fight or fight against. it is just a way to faster switch squads and squad weapons without having to micromanage everything when you want to fight different kind of opponents.
I assumed that the current Japanese gear would simply have a substantially lower battle rating than the top tier Allied equipment. Iām more concerned with how the Allies are supposed to be able to compete against top-tier Axis equipment.
Type 5 nato = arnor 12 mm max
Chi to = 75 mm hull max but sides 12 mm
Lol, any stuart can penetrate them like butter.
Good luck with balancing them
Us + ussr + germany = h&g threesome 
2 Likes
I have made a list about thatand tried to preserve authenticity as i could.
Early and late phase of war seems balance but mid levels allies are screwed up
We dont have enough mid term tanks to penetrate german cats for allies. Well thry actually exist but not in enlisted right now.
You can, you just need to hit the lower part of the gun mantlet . I remembered destroying jumbos with panzerwerfer 42 I got from custom game mods. Chi ha short gun can also do this since it has 2.64kg of explosive which is greater than 2.15kg of panzerwerfer 42.
Good luck trying to hit that at 300m+. If they die the Jumbos are probably dumb anyway.
Which is just plain stupid.
Current system is really that hard? Press campaign button and click on campaign button? This is too slow?
Its more or less the same.
I guess Darkflow needs to get their bad ideas from somewhere.
1 Like
problem of campaign queue is rigid parallel 6+ queues that need to be populated every minute or minute and half. with new system they are moving from parallel 6+ MM queues (for every campaign, so that means 8 queues at end of the year) towards flexible 3-9 MM queues on permanent basis (and that number could be easily increased to 15 to fine tune balance if player numbers allow). if there is not enough players for 9 queues they will reduce it to 8 or to 3 depending on number of players that could be matched to certain campaigns.
on peak hours when you have most concurrent players you will get more MM queues and off peak you will get less MM queues.
this is simply mathematical problem. if you have high playerbase you can do whatever MM system and it will probably work, but with low playerbase you need to be creative and flexible.
Lol Enlisted map is small and you will rarely have a engagement that is that far.
Besides that you are hitting a big gun mantlet not that damn mg port if you canāt hit it you have skill issue.
I tried it in war thunder and it is not that inaccurate as you said.
D-Day.
You cant hit everywhere. You need to hit the mg port of the mantlet or optics.
A issue the Jumbo doesnt have btw.
Yeah pretty sure you did against Jumbos.
You obviously still have different queues.
Aside from obvious Japan and Italy limits, do you think WT is one big queue or splitted up in diffferent tiersā¦ basically like campaigns?
9 is more than 8 and is still ibflexible and well still dofferent queues.
Well, then its obviously not the campaign model to blame for nor is it the right way.
From what i read, dunno if japanese army even encounter sherman, because i think there will be a good difference between them.