GIve MP34(o) It's Rightful Bayonet

[Lingguinea]

• Yes
• No

This is something that has been suggested twice before. It has been over a year since the last suggestion was made, and there was another year between the other two. I couldn’t find the original suggestion, but I could at least find the 2nd one:

Give the Mp34(o) it's bayonet like japanese (s1-100) one

can’t really lie as this one is a bit for bias reasons. and i am well aware that there are lot other guns that should have it’s bayonet but don’t. kinda on all sides. anyway, today i’d like to focus on the mp34. as a reminder, the " same " weapon on japan does have the bayonet: [1690212340-Enlisted-Make-Japanese-S1-100-sub-machine-gun_hires] so i don’t see why “german” mp34o shouldn’t. was suggested almost a year ago too. and that’s all. thanks for listening. P.s. yes, it would techn…

I still see no reason as to why the MP34(o) can’t have a bayonet. You can see in the image, on the front right side of the barrel there’s a mounting point, and as shown with the S1-100, it’s the exact same place the bayonet mount is located. Moreover, it’s the exact same bayonet the Wermacht used: the S84/98 III.

This wouldn’t make it overpowered. Why? The MP34(o) is pretty much worse than the S1-100 in every regard, despite being the same gun. It has lower damage (5.7 vs 5.9), has worse shot deviation (78 vs 70), higher vertical recoil (35 vs 25), and higher horizontal recoil (14 vs 10). Sure, they may not be huge differences, but the fact remains that if the S1-100 can have a bayonet and is stronger, the MP34(o) can too.

Besides, who doesn’t like going stabby-stabby with a bayonet?

[КвасноеСусло]