Are you trying to be dishonest?
Yes, that is exactly why it is to good for BR 2 both more pen and more importantly WAY BETTER POST PEN DAMAGE…
You entirely missed my point and then try to call me a hypocrite because of it.
Ones a tank ones a gun. Different proportions. Most built tank of ww2 had like 55000 made. Most built gun like 7 million
You said more pen doesn’t do anything when in your arguments against m61 you said the pen is op. Sure u can still argue too much post pen and still be wrong about that but at least be consistent
The most commonly cited figure is 49,234 Shermans, produced by the United States between 1941 and 1945. That total includes all major variants (M4, M4A1, M4A2, M4A3, etc.), with differences in engines, hull construction, and armament.
So sherman wasnt exactly common tank either ?
Wdym? What is your point?
No I said that more pen isnt needed as the M 72 already is good enough (if it isnt just L2P really) and then
The pen wasnt the main point but the HE filler inside of it…
Apparently chaffee is fine “because” different proportions.
But not even sherman fits your “most built tank” criteria.
Just wondering where this kriegerfaust logic ends.
Yes cuz I was referring to the most built tank of ww2… the t34. And having 10 percent the production numbers of your most built tank is pretty solid. That’s what we call commonly issued
Don’t know the exact timeline of which was added first, but I know the only diffrence between the premium jumbo and the normal one (except badass cosmetics) is that the premium one gets APCR
1 Like
You still tried to make it a point buddy boy. And once again I’m sorry you think a tank having advantage upon successfully penning the opposing tank in a primarily infantry focused game is op
You brought up the previous disscussion so dont act suprised when I do.
It was the one weakness the tank still had… everything else was very good for BR 2.
I mean sure if you exclude having the third worst reload of br 2, br 1 armor, and only 20 he shells. Sure if you exclude all the weaknesses I suppose you could think it has no weaknesses
is this 10% somekind of hard rule ?
Since roughly 55k t-34’s were made and 5k isnt exactly 10% of that.
While there was 7k FG’s and roughly ~100k paratroops in total.
I said the most produced tank of each corresponding faction buddy
Ah my bad, could have sworn in my quote you mentioned “t34”
But anyway,
49,200 shermans were made during ww2
and 4,731 chaffees were made.
So it unfortunately wont fit in the 10% criteria of being common.
So are we using some little bit rounding number here to fit your bias or ?
I said “10 percent of your most built tank” your being your faction
And 10 percent isn’t the minimum I’m just saying it falls within the margin
ah gotcha, little bit rounding for chaffee is fine but FG is no no.
Production numbers mean nothing in this game. The most produced german armored fighting vehicle stug 3g is premium and the second most produced japanese tank is premium/event. All while tech trees are filled with rare prototypes only produced in single digit numbers.
5 Likes
Stug has tech tree variant and the chi ha Kai should be tech tree too