Fw 190 F-9 BR V

The Fw 190 F-9 was the final production version of the F-series Being an improvement over the F-8., Entering production in late 1944 and seeing combat in 1945


3840231210204859k

The FW 190 F-9 inherited the improvements and wing structure of the FW 190 A-9 Among the improvements found in the F-9 are:A new, more powerful engine that gave it a higher speed of about 30 km/h.Improved acceleration and climbing speed After attacking the ground,Improved handling of suspended armament loads,Improved cab for better rearward and downward visibility,It also had a tail from the Ta 152, which gave it more stability in flight and better performance. There were F-9s that didn’t receive the Ta 152 tail, but they still had good performance that was still superior to the F-8.

Characteristics

•Maximum speed: 665 km/h

•Fixed Armament: 2 MG 131 machine guns,2 20mm MG151 cannons And 2 30mm MK 108 cannons

•Suspended Armament:14-16 Panzerblitz 2 rockets and a 500kg bomb

Why is MK 108 in the configuration?

•The F-9 retains the same wing structure as the A-series, where the A-9 is the same, and that leaves The external spaces where the 20mm cannons were located, where the MK 108s were incorporated into that space, whether at low frequency or not.

•The MK 108s will compensate for the lack of TNT in the Panzerblitz 2s, where with each pass Infantry will be easier to defeat.

Panzerblitz-Solomaquetas-2
Cabezas-de-guerra-Panzerblitz-Solomaquetas (1)

•The Panzerblitz are the only rockets that Germany has that can carry in the same high capacity as their counterparts American (HVAR). But it lacks TNT to be effective against infantry at a long range, unlike other German rockets. But those rockets (210mm, 280mm) are heavier and The FW 190 cannot carry a large quantity due to its weight; it also lacks effective penetration against armored vehicles, unlike the Panzerblitz 2. Where you cannot effectively fulfill both roles Because it lacked TNT

With this configuration, the FW 190 F-9 would be a suitable addition for Germany to have a fighter-bomber “close” to the P-47.

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
3 Likes

yup we defo need a P47 type aircraft but 30mm is overkill i think

Could you just confirm; would it be able to carry both rockets and a bomb at the same time…?


All Fw 190s flies like bricks.

Better armaments is acceptable when you can’t turn to save your life.

5 Likes

yes, but p47’s get 50 cals only, 20mm would be fine i think

but then of couse, P47 can actually turn

.50 cals arent an issue especially when you get 8 of them.
US planes down just fine.

2 Likes

true its like 3200 which is busted

2 13mm 2 20mm 2 30mm, rockets and bombs, yeah it turns poorly for a single engine, does it turn as poorly as a twin engine.
2 13mm 420 mm and 2 500kg bombs thats br5 this is br6

and so is p-47.

no my point is this is in enlisted more deserving of being br6 80 50 cals is not equal to what the f9 has

uh we had an event with 2 500kgs and 20mm SHVAK cannons

so it has 6 20mm cannon rockets and bombs great that attacker would be a match for the f9

Were did anyone say that it would have 2 of them?
Did I actually miss anything or did you just make that up just so you can complain how op it would be?

So far the proposal indicates only 1 bomb…

or

note the sigular centerline hardpoint

my error but 2 13mm 2 20mm 230mm 12-16 rockets and a bomb on a single engine is too powerful

Theres reason for having guns.

allied counterpart with equal fire power in enlisted

like P47 with hvars ?

•Fixed Armament: 2 MG 131 machine guns,2 20mm MG151 cannons And 2 30mm MK 108 cannons

•Suspended Armament:14-16 Panzerblitz 2 rockets and a 500kg bomb``

vs
1 250 kg bomb
10 rockets
8 12.5mm

the 50 call is a great weapon better than the german 13mm
it is not as good as a 20mm
it is not as good as a 30mm

allies get better planes
axis get better tanks
the p47 is not even as good as the f9 much less better

fine, leave the MG131 out of equation.

8 .50 calls does shred planes just as 20mm or 30mm does.
30mm is there for cas as above explained the rockets arent nowhere near comparable to hvars.

I like how this ass-ymmetrical balance is fine with you when ever it suits your bias.
Meanwhile, in different topic you are whining for postwar tank.

:clown_face:

4 Likes

i dont love asymmetrical balance but i tolerate it
again i said as it is the 26e5 is not needed it be fun a nice to have but not needed
but if you add the fw 190 f9 it is needed the us at least at br5 would not have air supremacy
its not post war the standard is not a combat ready tank, or combat use it never has been but a working prototype sometime not even that (ho ri cough)
br2 axis semi auto rifle 100 made never used in combat cough
the 26e5 was a working prototype before the end of the war

Like in what kind of unicorn filled rainbow land you expect this 1 single plane to turn the entire air supremacy of murrica upside down ?

Oh no, the worst semi auto rifle you can imagine.
T20 ?
Hyde ?
Meteor ?

You really did get the short end of the stick here didnt u ?