because you wont accept any weapons above that
m2 fake weapon
t20 fake weapon
hyde44 fake weapon
pershing fake
sp fake
there is not enough above br3 left that matters
Ironicly, I havent been against any of these.
They just dont fit your “MInority” narrative or what ever you are pushing here.
who the fk cares ? Thats what you asked for.
Enjoy your max BR3 vs BR5
They earned it and deservedly so.
I’m sorry, but the FG42 was manufactured in larger quantities and was used in combat, unlike most of the weapons you mentioned.
I’m sorry, but they’re the same, and you also forgot to mention the M1 carbine as being homologous to the Gewehr 43.
Obviously the STG44 is going to be better than the Thompson because it’s an assault rifle. But you say NOTHING That the MP40 is inferior to any variant of the Thompson
I feel sorry for you, but leaving the FG42 and STG44 in the TT as unique and authentic weapons is not fantasy, unlike your weapons.
yes if they were used as the extremely rare weapons they were
because the mp40 is the only assaulter weapon for germany ?
because br3 4 5 outside of the hye the thompson is the entire allied assaulter tech tree
its not what i am asking for its what you are asking for
remove the ofendor, pershing, super pershing, t20, m2 hyde and there isnt enough left to call allied br 4 5
because each and every one of those weapons has been called fake by you multiple times
Not even an allied weapon.
They’re not fake as such, they actually existed in the forms they did, but they are all prototypes that never fired a single round in combat. They never were used in WW2, most were never even considered by the US military. The difference between those and the FG-42 or STG44 is obvious. Both of those were accepted into service, were produrced in considerable numbers and saw combat. None of that applies to any of the examples you draw. They are not the same class of weapons
1 Like
So can we have the leopard 1 as new adition now?
Clearly it is an iconic german tank used in WW2
From “A bridge too far” 1977
You really need to on your criterias really.
2 Likes
so double standards ? Which for you blamed others for.
Noshit ? You are moaning about FG42 not being common weapon but now you are moaning for murrican guns that never even were used 
1 Like
one even by german standards 7000 is not considerable numbers
if 7000 is considerable what is 3 million god like
they mad 100k g41 and 400k g42 do you not see something wrong with all three being in the same category
i never said those weapons should be added i said if things like the fg42 are added you need the t20 this is not a german wank we need some level of authenticity and balance an american had a better chance of dying of alcohol poisoning then an fg42
7k -/- 0
you sir make excellent points.
1 Like
It is considerable when compared to any weapon you mentioned. Because they never were produced in a single factory.
Also on a sidenote. Use some damn pumctuation. That’s painful to read.
1 Like
again i dont think the fg42 or t20 should be in the games tech tree. because 0 t20s were used in combat does not mean 7000 between the fg2 1s and 2s were used justifies there inclusion in the tech tree. one thats total production not combat numbers. lets say 80% made it to the battlefield, thats 4000 fg42 2’s in combat and 1600 fg42 1s. this was ww2 yes include it in the game but not in the tech tree. guns with tens, hundreds of thousands and even millions were used. i feel sorry for you if you think something like the fnab at 1000 belongs in the same group as the grease gun 600 000.
So rare that even exclusive squads were created for the use of these weapons (STG44) of 9-10 soldiers from both the Wehrmacht with its assault squads, Volksgrenadier, Panzergrenadier Just like the Waffen SS, even the Fallschirmjäger had squadrons like this.Also, it should be mentioned that the FG42 also had squadrons where it was the primary or secondary weapon.
Even so, it’s better than its German counterpart (MP40)
You ask the same thing about the FG42 because of its “low numbers” and exclusivity, so I also apply that logic to the aforementioned allied weaponry.
for
remove the ofendor, pershing, super pershing
making the k2h immune to everything but airplanes
, t20, m2 hyde remove the fg42 and ill join the campaign to remove them myself you get two for one and ill throw in both 50 round thompson germany gets br4 5 assaulter superiority over us
one i have never once asked to remove the stg44 producing half a million they were in every way a revolutionary advancement that was used by numerous german soldiers. 10000 fg42 and derivatives less than 10000
compared to 100k g41, 400g43, 15 million kar 98 its not how many there were its how common it was. compared to 6 million carbins, 3 million garands 1.5 million svt russian rifles and god knows how many mosin nagats.
The Ofenrohr is a German weapon, so the Allies shouldn’t have it.Pershing and Super Pershing, I mentioned, should be eliminated if we use your logic, and now you’re saying the Allies will now be harassed, but I remind you the same thing happens to the Germans with the CAS Allies
Sorry, the FG42 did see combat, unlike the T20, and there were more issues than the M2; they’re not the same.
I will use the STG44 and MG42 to counter the Thompson, which is superior to the MP40.
Now you change things, those FG42s can be equipped in squads with a primary or secondary weapon In large or small quantities
Sorry but either removing both m2 and t20
Or even removing the t20 and hyde 44
Would just be handing br4 and br5 to the axis over the us
Remove the German supper zook Pershing and super Pershing and allies might as well not leave br2
The same can be said of you with the CAS, where you dominate without German opposition. If the Allies do it, it’s correct and historical. But if Germany does it, it’s incorrect and ahistorical. You only use Logic is on your side. But when it isn’t, you complain.
They already have the M9 Bazooka and flank, and if it’s in a gray zone then they’ll use CAS to deal with it.There is also the M36 to be able to deal with German tanks. If they can’t, then it’s the fault of the Allied doctrine of bringing out heavy tanks up to level 45, and also the lack of skill of the Allied players.
The Kugelblitz will be helpful in dealing with the annoying Allied CAS
Yes but the allies have planes and Germany has tanks no not equally
Germany still has better tanks k2h Ferdina d
If you remove br5 sf ar and tanks what does the allies have to fall back on
So Germany dominates rifleman, assaulters, tanks and allies get planes that 90 percent of players won touch
I have almost never seen the tank slot open for long planes almost always at least on slot
The same can be said of Germany, which is neither equal to, nor close to, nor superior to the Allies in CAS.
To the Allied CAS as they have always done since 2021 since the introduction of the Normandy Campaign to Enlisted Flanking tanks and using his M9 plus the M36
The Fallschirmjäger players with the FG42 can make a difference, just as those using the Gewehr 43 can against the Garand.The STG44, along with the MP40, will counter the Thompson. German tanks are superior to Allied tanks in doctrine.And a large portion of German players use tanks because they don’t have aircraft with comparable payloads in fighters and fighter-bombers.
One tiny issue without the m2 and t20 there is no counter to the
Fg42 1 fg42"2 and fg42’ scopped
Forgot those only faction with scoped sf and ars
Watching a dog movie with Frankie munez fro Malcom in the middle he is so cute