again tiger 2h made
vs all tiger 2s around 500
You could go to the streets and ask any randoms about these arms, and I’m pretty sure no one would be able to name them either.
The same goes for many other guns and tanks. If general public calls assault rifles machine guns, not sure how they are able to distinguish an M1 Garand from the M1903.
Saved for maybe the M1911 and the Thompson, since the gun is used in many gangster movies and games from the 1920s and 1930s/ other media.
M50 Reising
Johnson M1941
Hyde M1944
M2 Carbine
T26
M2A4
M1918
M1918A1
Johnson LMG
Lanchester
Owen SMG
M1917 Enfield
A13 Mk. III Tank
Indian Vickers LMG
Browning Auto V
M1C Garand
Springfield M1903A1 USMC
…
Whatever your criteria say dude.
Your criteria are stupid.
Who could have guessed that a tech tree with at least four nations would offend the ignorant American compared to tech trees with one, one, and 2.5 (counting India and Australia) nations?
Well, it is understandable. Romania didn’t appear in Saving Private Ryan or Fury after all.
3 Likes
Production numbers
- Tiger II total production: ~492–495
- Henschel (H) variant: ~ 445–450 tanks
- Porsche (P) variant: ~ 50–52 tanks
2 Likes
More than 85-90% of the time, it can be said, was where Infantry, Armored and the Luftwaffe were focused on their number 1 ideological enemy.And that it was a great threat, unlike the allies.
Nothing, because they had nothing to do there when they were already dealing with the greatest enemy of the conflict. Even before the USA entered the war, the Pacific was a walk in the park for the Marines. Unlike the Army, which had a difficult time with the remnants of the Wehrmacht and Waffen SS
We have a fan from that country (Valkay) who gave you information. You endorse their numbers and combat use, but you continue to deny reality.
The only times the Fallschirmjäger jumped since the FG42 was incorporated were to rescue Mussolini and the poorly executed assault in the Ardennes Because after the Crete disaster, Hitler forbade another jump by his Fallschirmjäger
The Tank Destroyer that was used in Kursk and onwards, which has a 15:1 kill ratio, is neither iconic nor accurate in the TT.Oh, what I have to read.
0 T20s, 0 Hydes, 1 Super Pershing, 25 Pershings, 254 Jumbos, 0 P-80s and Meteors in combat
Sure, and you’re leaving out the MP40. The STG44 saw combat, Garand = Gewehr 41/43
What do you mean they weren’t created for use in Europe?If its purpose was to withstand the 88mm of the Tiger I and other powerful German cannons with Japanese coconut trees They weren’t going to give the weakest Sherman in terms of armor any trouble.
492 Tiger 2
Thompson, no problem, saw the fight; Hyde, no problem.
The Me 262 served as a day and night interceptor, a fighter-bomber capable of carrying two 250kg or 500kg bombs.With its 4 cannons or 2 MK 108Where the pure or reconverted Jabo variants fulfilled that function A squadron of pure Ace fighters was even created specifically for this fighter.Under the command of Adolf Galland
Besides, the Meteor was unnecessary due to Allied air supremacy and because it did not see combat, with Germany being the only faction whose jets did see combat.
That doesn’t change the fact that German 75mm, 88mm, and 128mm cannons destroy them with one shot.And so you can withstand the cannon fire of the Allied tanks Where in the 1 vs 1 fights Germany will win
The Wirbelwind is necessary for Germany to deal with the Allied CAS, whether you like it or not.
again you confuse important and iconic
i said movies tv and games
i did not say only american
again the importance is allowing small number of produced weapons included only favors germany funny how none of those weapons listed are in the meta
loss of the m2 and t20 to counter the fg42 vs any of those weapons
Not really, Germany was known for highly advanced tech and used alot of them.
So if it wasnt in saving pvt. ryan it isnt iconic ?
like t20,hyde,pershings,murrican jets, drum tommys
Those sure are not meta and only favors GE.
1 Like
Of course, only Western…
And of course, “Western” translates to “American.”
2 Likes
i said you did not have to limit yourself to just american movies sunny but other countries have made ww2 movies
again remove both rare weapons and prototypes
or include both of them
again im fine with
garand thompsons 30 rounds vs g41 g43 stg44
ok suggest a weapon weaker than the t20 but as strong as the fg42 no the m2 is not one
super pershing not ww2 pershing was
also only not in the war more because the allies were too busy curb stomping germany to wait for the pershings to catch up , and yes the brits reall7y fell down on market gardne
not the one who mentioned fury and saving private ryan both american
both banger but there are more
It is best known for being used in the 1976 film The Eagle Has Landed . It has also appeared in various video games like Medal of Honor and Wolfenstein.
FG42.
So in which movies did the hyde, t20 or meteor appear ?
let them soviets handle 99% of the fight and call the 1% curbstomping.
So, just out of curiosity do they play the pvt. ryan in history classes and call it a day ?
If you followed your own words, you would have seen European movies that focus on the Eastern Front and include or at least mention Axis members of Eastern Europe. The movie Stalingrad, for example, did this or The Last Assault.
But you clearly didn’t.
Couldnt mention one.
Classic.
But how many people know that?
How often did they appear in the hundreds of WW2 movies you definitely saw but couldn’t really mention?
So if some of the Axis weaponry used in WWII doesn’t appear in a Hollywood or other country’s film, it’s no longer iconic or true?It can’t be with the argument you just gave My God, seriously, you’re running out of arguments that you never had to win anyway. But this is a joke.
So if that was the case, why did they end up using them?There’s no logic in your comments anymore.
I also remember seeing the Me 262, Tiger 2H, Tiger 1, Panther, FG42, STG44, and the FlakPanzer IV Wirbelwind in Medal of Honor and Call of Duty, but not your prototypes.
alternate history
wolfenstein alternate history
you really want to die on the cod hill case i can go look at what guns have made it into cod games vanguard included
like most of murrican films ?
Not really even history to be honest but since you just said “games”
Well you could be more specific with your absolutely retarded requirements that seems to shift constantly.
Wow, at least you know now that Poland was part of WW2, I guess.
You mean the hill you created and sit on like an utter illiterate, ignorant moron?
So now the argument that it has to appear in video games/movies is no longer valid because T20, Pershing, Super Pershing, Hyde, Meteor, P-80, etc. no longer appear?
| Submachine Guns | |
|---|---|
| 3.1 | Armaguerra OG-43 |
| 3.2 | BSA Welgun |
| 3.3 | Carl Gustaf m/45 |
| 3.4 | Franchi LF-57 |
| 3.5 | M1A1 Thompson |
| 3.6 | MP 40 |
| 3.6.1 | MP41 |
| 3.7 | Owen Gun |
| 3.8 | PPSh-41 |
| 3.8.1 | PPS-43 |
| 3.8.2 | K-50M |
| 3.9 | Sa 25 |
| 3.10 | Sten Mk II |
| 3.10.1 | Sten Mk I/Sten Mk VI Hybrid |
| 3.11 | Type 100 (1944-1945 model) |
| 3.11.1 | Type 100 Paratrooper |
| 4 | Shotguns |
| 4.1 | Becker revolving shotgun |
| 4.2 | Browning Auto-5 |
| 4.3 | Lincoln Jeffries Double Barreled Shotgun |
| 4.4 | Winchester Model 1897 |
| 5 | Select Fire/Self-Loading Rifles |
| 5.1 | Breda PG |
| 5.2 | Fedorov Avtomat M1919 |
| 5.3 | FN F2000 Tactical |
| 5.4 | Gewehr 43 |
| 5.5 | Gustloff Volkssturmgewehr MP 507 |
| 5.6 | Hyde Carbine M1944 |
| 5.7 | Korovin AK-45 |
| 5.8 | M1 Garand |
| 5.9 | Mauser Selbstlader M1916 |
| 5.10 | MBC-2 |
| 5.11 | PTRS-41 |
| 5.12 | SIG Stgw 57 |
| 5.13 | Sturmgewehr 44 |
| 5.14 | Sudayev AS-44 Model 4 |
| 5.15 | Tokarev SVT-40 |
| 6 | Bolt-Action Rifles |
| 6.1 | Arisaka Type 38 |
| 6.1.1 | Arisaka Type 99 |
| 6.2 | Karabiner 98k |
| 6.3 | Lee-Enfield No.4 Mk. I |
| 6.4 | Mosin Nagant M1891/30 |
| 7 | Machine Guns |
| 7.1 | Bren Mk2 |
| 7.1.1 | ZB vz. 26 |
| 7.2 | Charlton Automatic Rifle |
| 7.3 | Degtyaryov DP-27 |
| 7.3.1 | RP-46 |
| 7.4 | Kg m/40 |
| 7.5 | M1918A2 Browning Automatic Rifle |
| 7.5.1 | Colt R75A |
| 7.6 | Marlin Model 1917 |
| 7.7 | MAS AA-52 |
| 7.8 | MG 42 |
| 7.9 | Type 11 |
| 7.9.1 | Type 91 |
| 7.10 | Vickers Mk. I |
| 8 | Flamethrowers |
| 8.1 | Flammenwerfer 35 |
| 8.2 | M2 Flamethrower |
| 9 | Launchers |
| 9.1 | Bomb Thrower, 2 inch, Mk I |
| 9.2 | M1 Bazooka |
| 9.3 | Panzerfaust |
yep cod goodness
again i am saying they belong in the game as much as the zh29, the armagueera, fg42 ect ect i made a far more inclusive list in the m26e5
Of all those weapons you mentioned, only the FG42 appears in Medal of Honor and Call of Duty, so they are not the same.
and the fg42 was only used as a paratrooper weapon no matter how they entered the battlefield, so if it was a paratrooper weapon and not tech tree id be happy with the other sf weapons being removed, the game would be better for it