FlakPanzer IV "Wirbelwind" BR III

It’s not relevant having Gewehr 41, 43 and FG42

Iconic Hungarians

There’s no problem. But there’s a quantity manufactured and used.

Weapon used by the Volkssturm

Weapon used in large quantities for the final product of the STG44

The first Prototype of the STG44

Weapon used in large quantities, especially towards the end of WW2

NOBODY He requested the Swiss weapon in the German TT

Weapons used by Italians

Weapon used by the Volkssturm

Tank used in the early stages of WW2

Used Italian fighter jet

Aircraft used by Germany and Italy in small quantities

Romania’s main fighter jet that outperforms the IAR-80

The same applies to Italy’s top and best fighter jets. You demonstrate your ignorance and resentment.

The fighter jet that outperformed the BF 109 and has many variants, stupidity again.

Weapons you use with good performance, especially the Italian tank destroyer

3 Likes

Again being used does not make them iconic
The m1 garand is iconic
The johnson rifle is not
Again you don’t get to set the bar just high enough for the axis to clear
There are dozens of iconic WW2 weapons not hundreds
Italy German Japan
Romania is not an iconic axis member
Yes the Italian air force famous for um,mgice me a minute oh sucking and dying
A bomber that broke speed seconds until you put weapons on it
List movies, tv shows, games that used it

Known by historians and ww2 buffs would make the super Pershing an iconic weapon ifvww2 along with the p80 and meteor
Really mg1 infantry and I don’t mean vehicle mounted in ean the one with a stock and pistol grip we have in game was used in the thousands really

It’s an unfortunate constant never ending cycle of because X faction has this X faction must receive that.

Italy had very good fighter jets, where it outperformed its Allied and Soviet counterparts, as well as its ally’s BF 109. It also had a naval force comparable to the Royal Navy.Romania was an important ally on the eastern front, both in terms of troops and fuel.

One Super Pershing that only saw combat in Europe where it barely destroyed tanks, one Meteor and one P-80 that did not see combat That doesn’t make them iconic, unlike their German counterparts.

again i said comparable to the weapons listed they are
iconic means well know to the degree even outsiders know about it
like jordan is known even if you dont watch basketball
erhnhart is known outside of racing
iconic does just mean it was used sorry but most people dont even know romania fought in ww2 for germany, no not just americans
sorry again there are dozens of iconic ww2 weapons if you include hundreds the word looses meaning

A weapon becomes iconic because of its high/low numbers, performance, and new type of combat weapon; German weapons achieved this, while Allied weapons did not.

Romania may not appear in the history books, but its contributions to the war are undeniable, and that doesn’t diminish the fact that it was an important ally, even more so than the Italians and the Hungarians.

Dunno, I believe in my middle school history books had pictures of tiger, KT, FG & STG all which changed the developement of weapons even after ww2.

Germany was depicted as with highly advanced weapon systems regardless they lost the war of attrition.

1 Like

yep as was the armagueera and kiraly 39m not
important does not mean iconic
presidents and prime ministers are important and iconic
there seconds are important but only iconic if they ascend to the top level
sorry but Romania is nor iconic

Oh no, the worst gun of the game :frowning: what would ppl do without it.

about ~65k kiralys were made & used during ww2 id say its quite alot more than ~200 m2 carbines or 5k chaffees.

cool perhaps you should ask trump to be playable character

well neither is the murrica, soviets were the ones that did the fighting.

1 Like

one in europe and america was the one that made the weapons
in asia it was the us
and uk made the tea lol
so the uk didnt matter the us didnt matter and asia didnt matter wow i love youre ww2

Not sure how that changes anything iconic.

Well UK had iconic battle of britain, everyone heard of.
In grand scheme since you like numbers so much, the western allies hardly did shit compared to soviets.

But apparently the number game doesnt really work here ?
~80% of GE casualties were from eastern front, just saying since the “Numbers” matter but according to your numbers logic the western allies shouldnt even exist.

2 Likes

Yeah Sadly war is diverse and not everything was iconic enough to appear in movies.
Boring !!!

4 Likes

So iconic means that morons with no education beyond one chapter in you school book knows them.
Guess you are the expert in that regard.

4 Likes

again in europe, and you love numbers so much
how much of the elite germany army was tied down on the western front static doing nothing watching to make sure the allies did nothing
what did the russians so in asia before 1945 nothing and even than they beat an isolated poorly armed and trained army that could have been left to rot
what did they do in africa, hmm nothing
in the war of the Atlantic goose egg
the Mediterranean farts
i have to problem with rare weapons in the game
but you cant balance rare weapons like the fg42
with mass issue weapons like the garand

quite sure the most of “elite” or “veteran” forces of GE were tied to eastern front.

Relatively irrelevant since the wirbelwind isnt suggested to japan so asia is kinda out of question here.

soviets cant fight all of your wars.

except if it fits your bias ofc, like m2.

sory but the kiraly 39m is not a well known weapon by any one but history buffs, ok the fg42 cause paratroopers drop from the sky but the ferdinand again history buff
you cant take someone who knows every battle of ww2 and use them as the standard

again the most important part hmm who does allowing rare small number weapons most favor
the us nope
the ussr
japan almost there
oh the axis

t20,pershing,hyde,drum tommy, jumbos, meteor, öfenförörörö

yeah it favors murrica the most.

again
garand thompson
vs g41 g43 stg44
im fine with an imbalance if it represents history
not fine with germans getting everything

again jumbos 256 not made used in europe
and you need the t20 because of the fg42
how many tiger2 hs were made not tiger 2s tiger 2 hs
yeah no excuse for the hyde or 50 round tommy just balance
i think you meant to say super pershing
again if they kept the me262 to the anti bomber role it preformed in any regularity yeah the meteor is unneeded
take away the german super bazooka just give the germans tanks br4 and after the runs out of fuel mechanic the green crew mechanic, the spends more time in maintenance then on the battlefield mechaniC
the every tiger faces five shermans mechanic

okay so 256 out of ~50k shermans is somehow a significant number ? Or what logic are you using here ?

So numbers doesnt mean much on this regard.

More than jumbos, ironicly.

except it was used for every role, but lets not that tiny detail derail your not at all biased rant.
after all meteor was used to intercept v2 missiles at most which is totally comparable.

the fk is german super bazooka ?

do we also add somekind of seasoned soldier mechanic meaning the US has just 5hp ? just to demonstrate how they have never seen combat unlike most GE troops that would have 10hp
and ofc we could also give murricans bit more dispersion say 0.7 and GE gets 0.2