For the BR 1-3 I propose the Flak 88 For more lethal destruction against BR 3 KV-1/2sThe 88mm gun with 153mm penetration will be helpful in having more options to deal more efficiently with such tanks.
This 128mm cannon is for the BR IV-V, the same cannon mounted on the Jagdtiger, the Pak 44 L/55 128mm A deadly, lethal, and suitable option for this BR V With a monstrous penetration of 312mm(30°)PzGr.43
(APCBC) at 500 meters It will be a scourge against the IS-2 (1944), Pershing and Super Pershing
The IS2 is already incredibly easy to take out with king tiger. I’m pretty sure the buildable AT guns can also take it out quite easily as it’s armor really isn’t anything special like the king tiger’s.
Obviously the base cannon for BR 5 will be the Pak 43 since the 44 is a heavy cannon option to build,I’ve also considered the Flak anti-aircraft guns.
As I mentioned, it’s another option for engineers to build.
Another option for those levels; I know there’s more equipment in BR 3, but it’s also a good option for the BR.
BR1 and 2 matches would be completely dominated by flak 88s. For the health of the game, i do not support this at all. People like to point at the KV1 and say we need this in BR2 all the time, just because BR2 sometimes fights BR3 doesn’t mean you need BR3 level gear in BR2. It’s a progression system and higher tier equipment is supposed to be better. In br3 you already get the bigger AT buildable as well. I personally see no purpose for this.
Another bad suggestion that boils down to BR5 compression. If BR3 Russia got uptiered more often then I doubt people would consider it as problematic as they currently do.
Also balancing out or removing body armor might help as well. I lean more towards balancing it out, I’d prefer if each faction felt more unique and leaned more towards a specific play style.
I don’t think this is a bad suggestion; on the contrary, it’s a good suggestion since it raises the possibility of using a more efficient anti-tank gun than the standard one for all nations.With its respective cannon, obviouslyIf you don’t like it, that’s another matter. But the suggestion itself is good.
Soviet armor must REMOVE It provides an artificial advantage and is most noticeable with the vitality ability to absorb damage.
I don’t think they can move it much like a Pak 40, but they can rotate it, whether it’s a Pak 43 or 44.
Well, that was the case before. But the Soviet and Allied cries changed that with the prototypes and weapons captured in the TT.,I’m asking precisely for what makes Germany special.
Flak 88s in br4 and 5 with very limited shells, can’t be reloaded once empty, and takes up all engineer structure points, fine. Otherwise it’ll just be toxic to have in br1-3
I’d like to see some big cannon emplacements, but it would definitely require a lot balancing and gameplay polishing/rework.
An 88mm Flak36 on some grey-zone cliffs will be way worse than a Tiger II (H), especially when anyone with a maybe Engineer III squad can build it.
