Feedback for last update

basically merging/joining. It refers to when Austria became a part of Nazi Germany. (and other countries that did the same)

1 Like

Well it means connection and few other meanings but mainly connection. So in context the whole event in 1938 was connecting/merging of Austria to the third reich.

It’s when Germany vore’d Austria

It means annex.
Austria voted to ask Germany to annex it, which absolutely none of their neighbors were happy with. Czechoslovakia especially.

Believe it or not, while the nazi party was pressuring the vote, it’s widely accepted that Austria was going to vote for the anschluss even without the pressure.

I don’t think any other countries joined the same way but I could be wrong. Czechoslovakia was invaded, as was Danzig (free city contested between Germany and Poland which sat between the recognized main German border and the German territory of Konigsberg) which started the war in Europe.

that was the word I was looking for xD

1 Like

My thoughts about the last big update (Normandy) after some time of playing:

Things I like:

  • Something new
  • Beatiful maps
  • Semi-auto rifles for Moscow, but I havent tried them yet because of incredible amout of xp needed.

Things I did not like in the new campaign:

  • Broken AI - 1 tapping through everything and everyone across the map
  • Boring weapons - no STG, no Thompson (havent tried them because this is my first time in Normandy), broken MP-34.
  • Unballanced maps
  • Unballanced tanks
  • Unballanced plane rockets
  • Too much fogg and smoke in the maps, which makes Bots OP, because you cant see them, but they can see you.
  • Painful progression for Normandy and overall grindfest has not been removed, I cant test new things which are locked in the highest levels because of too much xp needed, thats not fun, at least for Beta while we must test everything, and I hope that before wipe (which is also a reason for me to not grind those high levels) we will get everything to try it out.

Got bored too fast and moved back to Moscow campaign to just have fun and forget about testing anything.

2 Likes

agree

If you haven’t tried them I will give you a slight preview:
They now deal 12dmg (they dealt 8.5dmg before the buff) which is great but there are several bugs which limit the SVT. SVT sniper has bad FOV despite using the same scope as M91/30 and bullets are very inaccurate, I almost never hit exactly where I aim
See my complain here: Sniper SVT-38 scope bug!

I don’t like them too. They always kill me across the map but also they die very quickly because they have no situational awareness

They will be reintroduced, just like SVT and G41 were

Invasion maps are great but Conquest is garbage just like in Moscow
My idea is make more invasion maps and turn conquest into lone-fighters exclusive

Which one?
Puma is very unbalanced but it’s mostly because devs have no idea that armoured cars should be slower on mud and grass

some are

I like the fog and smoke but AI should be blinded by it just like players
I also have no idea why is fog present only in Normandy summer and not in Moscow winter where it should actually be

Devs are changing the progression system in the new update, I just hope they will fix things up

If you ask me, Moscow is even worse than Normandy with tiny maps and MP-41’s around every corner
I only play Moscow to get the t-28

1 Like

T-28 is amazing btw
It’s genuinely something to look forward to

You unlocked it?

Yeah I got it in a couple days of grinding
I’ve already finished the Soviet campaign again

2 Likes

man… u fast

I have a question, are secondary turrets being controlled by AI, that could be cool?

And is 75mm gun better than godawful 35 and 37

2 Likes

The secondary guns are slaved to the main gun
The coax is modeled as the proper ball mount so you can fire above and below your max elevation and what not
The gun splits nazi wigs
HE is Puma tier

It also proves Tcat wrong about the KV-1 considering the amount I’ve gotten bombed in it lmfao

1 Like

shouldn’t it be stronger than puma considering it’s 75mm instead of 50mm (like Pz3N for example)

If you ask me, I think t-34 is even better considering how slow KV is ))))))
At least playerbase voted for t-34

1 Like

Honestly I just laser people with the MGs mostly, HE is good though. I was just trying to give something everyone already has to base it off.

I’m fine with either one tbh, but the KV is more appealing by virtue of being a slow dumb box like the Tiger 1

1 Like


prepare to be bombed by thousands of angry Wehraboos

1 Like

I’d rather the KV-1 than the T34 to be fair.

2 Likes

Yes, the proper description of the Tiger is an immobile dumb box.

@_31420124242011 @8383908 @41048361
I will make a poll about tanks tomorrow and we can end this argument once and for all

“No”
We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender

2 Likes

ok

1 Like