Hahahaha… what?
Seems I attempted to be funny and failed. 
In the screenshot above I missed the daily chore by 30 points, and because I started my comments here stating 9000 is too much…
…then that it isn’t…
it seemed proper to finish with a comment yes it is too much, should be a teensy bit less.
My actual suggestion for my mental health is this:
But a limit of 8969 will also suffice… 
I get it now, but yea it wasn’t that easy to catch considering how many karens like to shout about such things here.
As for the points thing I guess thats fair, I personally have 0 issues with it as Im quite good and also have a lot of free time, but understandable that not everyone could have everything as easy going
Do I really need to spell out how a 19th century auto fire rifle prototype which wasn’t even used in WW1, let alone WW2, will be now amongst the most powerful weapons in the game, placed on high BR?
In terms of balance this event is the worst we have ever seen. As others have pointed out the allies get better weapons (br3 sniper rifle vs br1 sniper rifle, their guns have a lot better accuracy and bullets/mag, lee enfield is superior to both the mannlicher and the armaguerra in these aspects, armored apc with mg vs sdkfz truck with no armor and guns). Most games feel like if it would be a 3 v 3 with 7 bots that try to act like humans.
The idea of the even fight event is welcome, and hopefully the devs will release better even fight events in the future but this event is often times a seal clubbing fest of veteran players vs noobs and some of the weapons are completely unbalanced (sniper, bolt action rifle, tanks). If the attacker team cannot capture the first point in 5 minutes they are guaranteed to lose. (Same happens in Tunisia normal battles, nothing suprising…) This was kind of solved with paratroopers to prevent hardcamping this is why the allies’ winrate dropped when the OG-43 squads were released back in the day.
As for the rewards, almost everyone would have been more hyped if the rewards were either more unique or more useful.
One of the things that I definitely liked about the event was that you actually KNEW which theatre of war you will play on the entire time. Reminded me so much of the old, pre-merge Enlisted. I do not know about you guys, but I never liked the randomness of the locations we got after the merge.
Finally people realize what we lost the freedom to play the theaters you like and actually to have 6 factions since UK and Italy where real factions back then despite having limited equipment.
correct me if i am wrong but the old campaign system if applying the new br system
would the campaigns have been ±0 ±1
then i am fine with a reversion
but from what i recall it was more ±2 in which case hell no we just escaped the hell of stock shermans seeing tiger 2’s
Not really, for exemple in Moscow campaign you can use some guns wich they are actually in br5 (like the fedorov avtomat for exemple).
An other exemple: in Normandy , I was able to use my Tiger 1 against some Stuart and Sherman …and the terrible Jumbo 
Before the merge, if you wana something more historical you can mix kar and stg in the same squad for exemple, now it’s really hard to play in hight br against proto lazer SF guns with bolt action 
Maybe I can share some feedback about this event.
It wasn’t exactly an “Even Fight,” because the teams were clearly not balanced — as many people mentioned in the posts above.
The use of predefined squads is something the community strongly dislikes, which is also very obvious from the feedback here.
On the positive side, similar to the recent Market Garden and Soviets vs Japan events, you can still earn upgrades for the predefined squads — as long as you have those squads unlocked. For me, it’s a mixed bag, since I already have everything unlocked and fully upgraded for Germany and Italy.
However, I really dislike that we cannot rearrange or rearm the squads, and that skill redistribution is also locked. I guess it is technically fair since both sides have the same limitation, but it still feels restrictive.
Another thing I don’t enjoy is the lack of bayonets (not to mention axes and swords), which makes charging practically impossible.
Then there’s the grind — the gain in silver and research points feels noticeably lower compared to regular matches, which takes away some of the motivation to play the event.
To summarize: it was still playable, and I can’t complain too much, especially since we got to play on Africa maps, which I personally enjoy.
What I really don’t like, though, is the reward structure.
In previous events, we received more weapons and, more importantly, event squads — and here there are none.
I believe the rewards could have included:
- A new event squad (or two squads - one per side).
- A new vehicle — not just a vehicle skin. Vehicles are a sensitive topic, since Gaijin often copies content from War Thunder but sells it at a higher price, and many very interesting vehicles never make it into Enlisted at all (like AA vehicles and special variants, not to talk about tanks and planes).
- Legacy campaign squads that are no longer obtainable, and not everyone owns (e.g., the 46th Infantry Division Rifle Squad, the 7th British engineer squad, Italian 101st motorized Division 65th Infantry Regiment and 1st Infantry Division 92nd Infantry Regiment, etc.).
- Some previously removed premium/thematic squads (such as the 8th Bersaglieri Regiment, 1st Company Giaguaro, 2/24th Battalion (UK), 2/4th Commando Squadron (UK), etc.) could have been listed to the market during the event.
- More weapons — not just one MG and one AR. I would suggest at least three MGs and four ARs, so players could fully equip a standard MG and Assault squads.
To emphasize the issue with unit rewards - Gaijin did not provide any of the already existing content in this event except for several premium squads that are already listed on the market. Feel free to add any squads I may have missed below:
Main rewards
Y’all did way too much hype for a tank skin!
It’s not just about a single skin — the real issue is how poorly the event was designed, structured, and rewarded overall.
There will be a SITREP soon, yes
So any new on that one? We are leaving the territorry of what most people would see as “soon”… or did you mean the pre merge “soon TM” instead?
Given the state the forum is in I am highly confused why such a post isnt the top priority in order to stop the bleeding playerbase.
Some example post just created today / 1 day ago. Or just look at the comments for the october sale.
[image] To Darkflow/Gaijin/whoever in charge of this game, People will not pay money to a sinking ship. No matter how many sales there is, how big the discount is, Players will not pay money to a game where developpers skip annual event with no notice whilst all other major gaijin are having, do no communication, not have any plan for future, and just generally have no will to continue developing this game — only care about squeezing last droplet of money from fading players I know the most…
Moral is really bad right now. With no Holloween event, last two events being aweful and no sale for Console players is not helping. Devs not answering questions, rumors of merger to War Thunder also is going around. The silence in Enlisted staff is something we all wish would not happen. We are not asking for anything unreasonable but you wont even meet us halfway. Did we the players do something wrong? Are you angry at us? What can I do? Use to be fun game, but now the devs are killing it.
People have zero faith in the dev team and feel abandoned by their community managers aswell as so far nothing had been done to calm down the fears laid out in the doom posts etc.
Unless the devs / CM do something fast to address the issues and doomposts I am sure more and more players will jump ship.
Losing players is the last thing enlisted needs when matchmaking is supposed to be improved in the future…
I hate when people speak for everyone just basing on just their “observations”. Bunch of complaining karens doesnt mean that “ENLISTED HAS FALLEN” as playerbase is still the same and its not like a mass exodus have happened. And also, last event was great.
And also, last event was great
Like the sherman one?
Where the main reward isnt even 100% functional as the tracks dont exist yet?
I hate when people speak for everyone just basing on just their “observations”
Do you want me to post even more links to post where people are venting their frustrations about the devs? Is that what you want?
It seems that this forum is now for whining. I even saw a guy in the game with the nickname “go whine on the forum.”
Like the sherman one?
Where the main reward isnt even 100% functional as the tracks dont exist yet?
No, the Tunisian one, it certainly wasnt any horrible like its claimed in one of the posts you referenced. The Market Garden wasnt that bad as well, it was just very challenging and required different tactics than usual
Do you want me to post even more links to post where people are venting their frustrations about the devs? Is that what you want?
No, because its quite illusory, of course it seems that there is a lot of people complaining, but its normal as people who enjoy things just stay silent. Its like with people rating products on the web, satisfied customers dont give a shit about rating
Depends on definition as Tunisia had more squads but still lacked a lot.
Italy stopped shining past level 20 and even before that, Italian Fighter planes has German planes, there were no Italian AT Bomber weapons, Tanker II had the Panzer III, not to mention that most classes were German/ couldnt function without Germans.
British past level 20 relied on land-lease gear saved for the Sniper Lee and the Beautifighter unless I missed something.
De facto freedom was also bad because no one wanted to play Axis for almost two years.




































 
    