So on your theory, majority of players are idiots
K
But let’s stop here and get back on topic
I already said what I want, better SMG’s and garands for USA, better tanks and MG for Germany
I must admit I don’t even know what on earth you are blathering on about.
That’s not an incorrect observation
Can you call people dumb for wanting to try asymmetrical balance
It’s a hard work but definitely doable
Players have hopes in it
You can call us dumb for having hopes… probably
But we are still going to have hopes
I’m calling them dumb because if there’s a poll asking for literally any new content they’ll vote yes
Not realy. MP was cheaper, lighter, less bulky and generaly had better ergonomy. The best sign that Tommy wasn’t so good is that it was replaced by M3.
Both were outclassed by PPSh, arguably the best SMG of that war.
It’s not my cup of tea but I often hear that UK had the better fighter planes than germans.
As above. Debatable.
Thompson is apples-to-oranges.
It was a gen 1 SMG while the MP 40 and M3 were gen 2, so they had different design goals.
Gen 1: expensive wood
Gen 2: cheap all-metal or with wood
Gen 3: expensive plastic
I was comparing guns by performance, not cost
If I’m a leader of a country, I would probably produce a cheaper weapon that does good job like MP-40
For the PPSh part, I was thinking maybe giving Russians best SMG, Germans best MG and Americans best Semi-Auto
But later I realized that if maps in Moscow don’t get fixed and stay the same eatgrinder s**t, giving the best SMG to one side…is probably not a good idea
1 Like
Gen 3 SMG’s were already in the era of… Duying
Because armies of the world started focusing on Assault rifles, SMG’s started being mainly produced for police use so they weren’t made to be “legendary designs” like PPSh, MP-40…
Basically, modern SMG’s are not very deadly as they once were
They are still just as deadly, idk what you are talking about.
Some are even deadlier, with armor penetrating capabilities.
Well, getting back to the heart of the conversation, I can’t quite understand what the developers are trying at the moment with Germany. They decided to give 250kg bombs to German fighters and 50lb bombs to American fighters. On Moscow, they neutered the IL-2 and buffed the Stuka. I’m scratching my head here.
1 Like
Those are 100lb bombs…not 50 I am pretty sure the americans never used 50lb bombs
And they literally gave the IL-2 8 rockets… If this isn’t buff idk what is
What are you talking about?
Performance whise my list is the same.
I think you ment that they aren’t as important as they were. Because deadliness remains the same for all of the weapons, no mater when they were invented. Unless we will have dirt cheap power armor.
I Have a cousin who works in the police and shot some modern and older guns
So That’s his words, not mine
Is he a killer?
I think the word is relevant.
AR derivatives have crept into the PDW role just as well as they’ve taken over rifle and carbine roles.
Unless you’re a bodyguard or something there’s no reason to use an SMG.
It’s not like they lost any lethality.
The ARs are just more lethal.
SMGs are probably more lethal between RoF and recoil, but ARs are a lot more cost-effective, easier to take care of, and hit the same bottom line anyway.