… and why does this post not contain any BR reduction if you demand a power level nerf?
these types of not thought out slop posts just feed gaijins badly managed information funnels into concluding “our pleb customers want mkb nerfed, we nerf mkb, be happy now plebs!” and then the gun gets ruined.
the issue might be the reason why the luftfaust is STILL in a way too high br despite gaijin “fixing” its br.
edit: with 10 bullets its much worse than the br2 mkb, this trash gun belongs to br1 so people actually have a reason to play it.
exactly, you dont understand what youre talking abount and nevertheless you demand changes to the game. reducing the ammo size by 33% is an extreme power nerf.
not caring about the consequences of this change completely invalidates your whole post. this is a prime example of why most posts on this forum are slop. not an insult, just an objective observation.
It’s quite clear that @Veekay45 cares for the accuracy of the weapon (or specificly the magazine) itself, rather than the exact performance of said weapon.
That’s a crude way of putting it, sure, a better way would be “I don’t care how exactly they’re going to balance the gun, as long as it’s magazine is corrected”, and that’s not an invalid position. People disagree over all sorts of minutiae (it’s the forums after all, as you said), on how best to implement a thing, so stating the overarching goal, leaving details for other to decide later, is a perfectly acceptable approach (indeed, it’s actually even encouraged by official suggestion guidelines for promoting discussion).
If anything, all this proves is that, even if you try to not have a position, people will still complain that you don’t have a position. There’s no pleasing everybody.
At best, Veekay should at least have considered writing a segment for what to do with the gun after the magazine is changed, something along the lines of: “here’s a plausable way to rebalance it, but it’s not definitive and not my main point, I just want the magazine corrected to historical levels, what exactly happens after isn’t my main concern”, but that’s about it.
In short, something I've done in a previous suggestion myself:
Change the stats of the new Patchett and make it BR III
Surprisingly people seem to have liked my proposed stat changes for the most part anyway in this example, so a third poll voting alternative seems to have been unnessesary in my case, but it is something I do recomend others to follow.
his position is demanding one sided, incomplete changes to the game in his own interest while actively ignoring consequences of this demands, putting his own interests ignorantly over the overall balance & objective quality of the game.
this is the definition of a low quality BS opinion. if people actually starting thinking like adults & using proper thinking, 95% of slop posts would instantly disappear, because people would post better, thought out things instead.
“Balance and quality” will not matter if we slowly turn into Vanguard clone with 100-round drum Garand and T-34-152 because they are “fun” to people like yourself.
Using your own wording, your “objective quality” argument is a slop opinion because everyone’s priorities are subjective.
For me it doesn’t matter if a gun is good/bad/BR0/BR6 as long as it didn’t even exist.
If they give you a 300 round Gaarand for Christmas, you’ll arrive parroting about “overall balance & objective quality” as well?
Hes priority is realism, 15 rounds dont fit into a 10 round mag. The balance consequences come after this, but a change is needed regardless of making this weapon weak.
If this wouldn’t matter, why not give us back burst G43 K? Its gameplay was tons of fun.
Well I using it for the tier 4 squad, at first I wanted to test it out, and ended up using it. It’s alright, but not br 3 worthy, in fact I honestly would use the Mkb.lll 35 for all of them. But I only have one and already using it.
i dont have a problem with realism, i pointed out he needs to combine both points into one post. thats the brainrot we’re dealing with here, people making low quality posts that harm more than they help instead of just being normal human beings who try to do things right and notice “oh wait, only decreasing the bullets completely changes the weapon balance, so i should also write that it needs to be downtiered too”.
these absolute basic levels of social conduct are too much to ask for in this community, it cant even surpass fortnite levels of intelligence if this is accepted. people can just be grateful they are being helped out and improve instead of fighting against the only post in months here that actually helps pushing the whole nonense here ahead.
You probably should have added a option for players who don’t give a shit about accuracy and just want to keep it at 15 rounds despite no evidence. I am pretty sure those are the people who voted no
In a situation like this there is no objective best route to go down. Veekay (and many others) clearly want this shit to be 10 rds. In terms of game balance, it is almost always subjective, as different players think and play differently. Also, 10 rds has nothing to do with “quality”
I dont even understand why people talk about quality and balance here, this is an event gun.
making it historically accurate and adjusting its BR to it would not hurt balance in anyway, its not like nerfing Mp-40 or Hyde1944.
