Honestly, Cromwell I don’t have a reason to be in BR3, but even if it’s changed to BR2, it’s not the tank need for US.
US need an all-rounder 75mm tank that can be used in BR2 like T-28E, Pz3N, and Ho-I.
It’s only have a premium Chaffee at the moment, but it would be perfect if Cromwell V was added to TT.
they are unlikely to do so. they have never changed a model last minute to my knowledge
Honestly, I think Cromwell I will be added as it is.
However, developers need to know that Cromwell V should be added to TT.
Currently, only US in BR2 does not have an all-rounder 75mm tank on TT.
Lol. You have got to be joking… all the nations BR2 75 are closed top stubby 75mm he lobbers also with germany getting their taken away!.. short barrel let alone snub barrel is anything but an all rounder… i would attribute that more so to the chaffee for some reason US seems to think they get this luxury.
I’m sure you’ll be quick to note marder with its rides pen but that’s an open top td
Also… you have casemate long 75 on br2 tank with 3 mgs and a 37mm main gun.
HE lob with the 75 and use 37 against tanks… huh… that literally seems like all rounder tank.
Honestly, It’s better than other tanks
but I don’t think there’s any worse 75mm all-rounder tank than this. (in US)
and Cromwell V is right at the end of BR2. (Never BR3)
Why do you need “all rounder” 75 in br2 where no other nations have such despite what you have stated
T-28E, Pz3N, Ho-I
It’s lie to say there isn’t.
they already have them in other factions.
Eventually they may add all Cromwells. At least we got the first one
Maybe that’s what I think.
ok i actually had a misunderstanding of the stats and the cromwell 1 could actually work in br 3 with apcbc.
I want more Cromwells
But it’s still AP.
Maybe if we keep BR3, I think it will be changed to APCBC.
But… I don’t think there’s any reason to use it at all.
Is there any reason to use it over Sherman and Wolverine…?
it could also get the american m1 57mm aphe. theres already precedent for having interchangeable rounds between the two as the 57mm field gun in game uses british ammunition
I know that, but,
Still, is there a reason to ride this over Sherman and Wolverine? It’s a question of.
Because in BR3, these two tanks are enough.
it has quicker reload more speed and more pen then shermans. plus its british.
But the most important thing is the ability to kill infantry.
Even considering the 57mm reloading speed
Sherman’s ability to kill infantry is better.
Also, the penetration is enough against BR3 tanks, so that’s not a plus factor.
Of course, if dealing with a BR4 tank, it would be different, but then I’d use Wolverine.
Because this is more certain.
So I have two things in BR3 Deck, Sherman and Wolverine.
actually looking at their stats theyre pretty similar while 57mm has a quicker reload. only downside is less fragments
Right.
That’s why I judge the fire rate, the range of explosions, and the number of fragments as a whole.
That’s why 57mm isn’t bad, but I don’t think it’s easy to kill infantry as reliably, widely and effectively as 75mm.
So that’s why I appreciate 75mm more than 57mm.
57mm would be better for War Thunder, but this game is Enlisted.
Pz3N is BR3 now, and the US has the M8 scott.