The Tiger could fight firefly in Tunisia now, the same we experimented with Berlin all BRs, but I don’t want higher than BR4 in Tunisia, maybe it won’t be too bad (ignoring the naysayers of course!)
Happy to discuss civilly below 
12 Likes
Expanding to BRIV is something I think could help Tunisa, BRV would probably be a pain though (which is another reason why it should be separated)
1 Like
With recent really good rework of cave village, I wouldn’t mind Tunisia to be available across all BRs.
6 Likes
The main issue with Tunisia would be openning it up to BR5, Im sure Tiger II and P-47 would have a field day.
Everyother BR is fine.
I have no clue what’s so problematic about Tigers II. Anyone can snipe them out with ofenrohr and they have lesser anti infantry potential than BR2 howitzer tanks.
P47 would be toxic on Tunisian maps the same way it is on Ardennes maps. Doesn’t really prevented Ardennes from being BR5 map.
And I think I don’t even need to start about Pacific island maps.
1 Like
Pershing is even better in anti-infantry role, I just said the Tiger II thing so US lunatics won’t whine that Im biased against their “perfectly balanced” HVAR spammer.
4 Likes
Can we try and read my original post I said for BR4 not BR5.
Why are we discussing BR5 and Pershing, Tiger II p47 in this, sorry but really trying to not see this post derail so quickly!
2 Likes
I did read it, I liked the post and posted my own opinion why it was not opened to BR4 and 5 when Berlin was.
So yes I agree that Tunisia needs to be open for BR4.
1 Like
Just a small reminder for an event / trial please
1 Like
(Bumping up)
I’d still like all br, including 5.
Because Tunisia is my favourite “campaign” and I do have high br Commonwealth lineups (Tempest, paratroopers, Bren carrier op at any br…)
1 Like
I think BR 4 needs more incentive to play. Locking Tunisia to BR 4 would be a massive incentive for BR 4 enjoyers.
1 Like
That’s a great point, BR4 is always seen as unpopular, but I have always had a BR4 line up in all factions, strongest was axis… I personally feel BR4 is the best most realistic high tier, not 5 with jets and automatic rifles, rocket tanks.
bR4 would work, I think panther and firefly could be ignored, we have a lot of commonwealth troops now, I even have a predom UK preset for BR2, 3 and 4…
1 Like
Half measure.
Br4 needs br +/-0, like all br. (Will gaijin do it? Doubtful, but it’s the only real way).
Locking Tunisia to 4 max won’t do much since map selection system is a placebo that does nothing at all…
Judging by what? Tunisia was one of the least popular pre merge campaign.
You are acting like you would lock Normandy to BR4 exclusively, not Tunisia.
1 Like
I would rather not be ever sent with my Panther or 76mm Sherman to North Africa, feels wrong and dirty.
1 Like
I know Map pref is placebo but perhaps, Devs could trial like they did for Berlin, so make it happen…
1 Like
I have now come to the realization that perfect HA isn’t possible due to how map matchmaking works.
I even have purely Brit TUN presets, or EUR (Normandy stuff and maybe pacific stuff just in case!), but the fact is TUN would be fun, it is far from unpopular and the recent rework on Kahif is much better!
I would ask you to do same, close eyes at 76’s, fireflies and just enjoy a different gameplay on TUN 
I think all maps will be available across all BRs in the future.
They just need to rework the most problematic ones.
There’s really no reason not to do so. BRs doesn’t reflect year of deployment. There’s plenty of late war stuff on low BRs and and vice versa.
There is a scale of HA, Tanks that never fought in a certain campaign are one issue - but time travellings are defined worse for HA.
Just because pure HA doesn’t exist, doesn’t mean we can turn this game into fortnight
Agree here, variety regarding maps is imo always a good thing.
Perhaps couple games against hvar spam or kt could accelerate the process to lock BR5 and to give a functioning tool to block maps / modes we dont want.
The HA is quite simple subject imo, it either is HA or it isnt.
If theres 1 lightsaber, then theres no HA. If theres no HA why there cant be another lightsabers to make it even for both sides.
4 Likes