The Tiger could fight firefly in Tunisia now, the same we experimented with Berlin all BRs, but I don’t want higher than BR4 in Tunisia, maybe it won’t be too bad (ignoring the naysayers of course!)
Happy to discuss civilly below 
7 Likes
Expanding to BRIV is something I think could help Tunisa, BRV would probably be a pain though (which is another reason why it should be separated)
1 Like
With recent really good rework of cave village, I wouldn’t mind Tunisia to be available across all BRs.
3 Likes
The main issue with Tunisia would be openning it up to BR5, Im sure Tiger II and P-47 would have a field day.
Everyother BR is fine.
I have no clue what’s so problematic about Tigers II. Anyone can snipe them out with ofenrohr and they have lesser anti infantry potential than BR2 howitzer tanks.
P47 would be toxic on Tunisian maps the same way it is on Ardennes maps. Doesn’t really prevented Ardennes from being BR5 map.
And I think I don’t even need to start about Pacific island maps.
Pershing is even better in anti-infantry role, I just said the Tiger II thing so US lunatics won’t whine that Im biased against their “perfectly balanced” HVAR spammer.
2 Likes
Can we try and read my original post I said for BR4 not BR5.
Why are we discussing BR5 and Pershing, Tiger II p47 in this, sorry but really trying to not see this post derail so quickly!
2 Likes
I did read it, I liked the post and posted my own opinion why it was not opened to BR4 and 5 when Berlin was.
So yes I agree that Tunisia needs to be open for BR4.
1 Like