Can we try BR4 Tunisia?

Ah… the good old days when there was still a lot of development…

Could have continued if gaijin had shown minimal efforts into attracting and most importantly, keeping customers in Enlisted…

The A13 never fought in Tunisia, so the M24, the Puma, the Panzer IV H and J, the M4A3 (105), the Dicker Max, Panzerwerfer, StuG III G, Panzer II F and the III B.

2 Likes

Wait a minute…

Wasn’t Tunisia unlocked for all br already not long ago?

I remember fighting a few Meteors in it. And flying a few myself. (Wasn’t customs. Haven’t played customs in months)

Did they just lock Tunisia to low br again?

Yes, they were testing the idea. They’ve found out Berlin is okay for all BRs, Moscow and Tunisia not yet.

That’s why they are reworking the problematic maps now.

2 Likes

I know it’s impossible with the current system but I’d still like to minimize the BS and not see more BS added.

So clearly wrong visuals like biplanes over Reichstag or Panthers in North Africa would cancel out all the “gameplay benefits” for me.

2 Likes

Where did I say I would lock Normandy to BR 4? Are you troubled at reading?

And that’s your opinion, Tunisia had a strong following when I used to play it. Doesn’t mean no one played it because it wasn’t as popular as the other campaigns.

Nah +/- ques would split the playerbase way too much. It’s fine the way it is now, they just need to blend the BRs better so they can compete with an uptier.

I still disagree with opening all maps up to every BR. If certain campaigns i.e Moscow are locked to lower BRs or Berlin to higher BRs, I have more chance of playing campaigns that I want to play.

That’s the issue…

What we want, is to select campaigns we are interested in.
It shouldn’t be while using a workaround (br), but with a real map selection tool… (what gaijin “gave” us is just smoke and mirrors. A disgrace)

As for br+/-0 it would be perfect, but as I also said, an Utopia I doubt gaijin will ever implement (they let down Enlisted too much to boost it’s popularity)

1 Like

Again both those ideas you mentioned would split the playerbase and make que times longer. That’s why the merge was implement to stop those things.

Are you troubled at reading?

Don’t bother replying if you’re going to instigate nonsense bait that isn’t any contribution to the topic :clown_face:

That’s literally what you did. Instead of arguing my point, you just put out a totally nonsensical fallacy in an attempt to completely twist the context. Pathetically thinking that’s how you’ll win the debate.

There’s simply nothing clever you can say. Because your initial point was simply dumb:

Next time, maybe try to defend your point instead twisting other’s people words.

1 Like

Not what I did but keep being delusional. Everyone on this forum knows what you’re like. You reply with passive aggressive bait with little to no constructive criticism. It’s embarrassing. Enjoy being the village idiot while no one takes you seriously.

Yet again :joy:

Pointing out dumb opinions is not passive aggressivity btw.

1 Like

I’m not going to defend my point to someone whose reply made absolutely no sense :rofl: you drop your snarky comment then act all high and mighty when someone calls you out for being a dickhead. If you want an actual debate, then how about you reply with actual logical comments instead of your nonsense bait. Now kindly piss off.

His opinion being dumb, is just your opinion. That being said

Also just an opinion.

How about you two take it easy and call it a day?

Yes. And I can easily defend it.

Lol, I was just responding to him out of boredom.

Gents chill OMG, hug and make up or something, it is a discussion on BR4 not who’s comment made other person think they were at fault.

2 Likes

I apologize for derailing your topic.

2 Likes

How would it increase the que times ? +/- 0 BR, sure that would split playerbase to some extend and probably could cause longer que times.
Easiest way to figure out is lock BR5 first and lets see how that works out.

Being able to select what maps / modes I play, I doubt would increase anyones que times.
If I want to play 1 map and 1 mode only, its my personal que time that gets increased not everyone else.
If everyone would be picky as Iam and willing to play only 1 map & mode only then everyones que times probably would increase but even in that case I doubt it would increase in any meaningful manner.

Id say during campaigns the playerbase was split to what ever campaign theyr favored faction was strongest at.
USSR was happy in moscow
GE in berlin
And so on, which was the “issue” and it has been somewhat fixed with this almost red vs blue balance.

1 Like