I am maxed out have premiums so have the luxury of being able to pick and chose stuff…
So let’s take Moscow for example.
I would like nothing more than taking my pz38t and bf109e to the front, but when I do I am faced against T34s and that means its slaughter, I would rock Ba11 and my LaGG but won’t for the pretty much same reason. (So I end up with Stug HEAT and 109 F2)
This also applies to other campaign once marshal I don’t really care about winning unless in my clan events.
As much as I am well against big progression, if I could roleplay I may be slightly more up for it, if I know the mechanics of how to ensure I don’t get in higher rank stuff.
I like using old or classic vehicles, but are they competitive, no not as good as end level / campaign on the whole.
Feel free to discuss and keep on topic, avoid the hate too 
2 Likes
Enlised discourages you from taking gear you want. You either take the strongest / meta things or you are in a noticable dissadvantage.
The same applies to playstyles.
But ppl are ok with this because “I also suffered” so it’s ok to not improve on things.
6 Likes
yes.
campaign roleplay is more difficult than playing non historical / meta.
you will be at an disadvantage ( something that i enbraced for my volkssturm and relatively HA loadouts ).
but, that’s the nature of the game and players.
they will always try to " go on top " with less effort as possible.
or use " what works ".
primarily because enlisted:
but unlike voyo claims
yes, and not.
people are ok with it because they don’t care. they are the first people using full meta and what not.
it’s more because HA it’s a niche.
and the only solution is through PVEs.
but, we don’t have those. so…
you either adapt, or stay true to your self.
( i’m more happy to fully clap soviets/german sweats with just bolt actions. shows them right )
3 Likes
This is why I want the battle rating system to come, so we can make nice historical lineups without having to verse the top tier equipment.
I miss old Moscow, I just want to use my winchester again…
3 Likes
battle rating does not do that though.
the battle rating have shown everything but HA.
1 Like
I know it dont do that, but boltactions vs boltactions would be refreshing to see again.
2 Likes
Except I’m not talking only about HA but generally about using nonmeta gear you enjoy.
to an extent
but pve is the answer
as… bots can’t really break that rule
( even though, i am the first saying that they could use some improvements and mechanics… but i’d say it’s a good compromise. put some xp cap for the day, or increase the number of bots to kills and you need to at least kill 5 soldiers to be on par / equal of a kill from multiplayer and what not. would be a starter compromiser. idk about you, but if you play a game to have fun, feel the immersion and what not, multiplayers are usually the last place you go for. as people are either dumb or just take advantage of what they can. instead of bots where they just know their place and act like they should. outside funny spin and jump climbing for whatever reason )
1 Like
No offence but I want to play against ppl in a multiplayer game. While PvE is a nice thing I also play, that’s not why I’m here.
I just want to have a fair battle no matter what crazy squad setup I use. That’s why I’ve been proposing spawn score. It’s the ultimate balance that allows you to use everything while remaining fair.
For example I want to play with PzII and StG squad. Because why not?
No other system will manage to ballance this.
But devs already said they won’t do that so all I’ve got left is complaining. (And holding my fingers crossed for TommyZZM.)
2 Likes
isn’t what we have right now?
why don’t you like it?
is it because players use latter equipment and what not?
or is it because someone will always go with the most ammount of meta possible even when the br will drop.
results don’t really matter.
and i’m not sure we’ll find what we are looking for.
but that would only work by the premise of you and your opponent having the same equipment.
which that’s not the case, i can bet after the merge people will be running with 3 assaulters / machinegunners / flametroopers and what not .
i don’t think it will be that fair if you are just running with rifleman squads, sniper or what you have.
odd choice, but i guess you’ll be able to do that after the merge.
yeah…
unless, you get into modding my friend
Because game penalises me for using stuff I like and playing the way I like.
Take meta stuff and run&gun or get bad exp and potentially bad gaming experience (depends on personal skill).
Not quite.
We can ballance things as you say: by equal power.
Or my way: by combination of power and quantity.
Wut?
If I’d take this crazy loadout I’d get eaten alive by an IS-2.
I know.
How can you solve this problem without adding a RespawnScore mechanism?
Even CSGO has some kind of RespawnScore mechanism.
The absence of a scoring mechanism means absolute abuse, and absolute abuse means the absolute uselessness of most things.
Even though they claimed there was some kind of diversity in the game, it never existed.
For example the fw189, I don’t know if this aircraft existed in the game.
Although sometimes some naughty babies quibble that fw189 is fun. But they are never fun. And these babies never use fw189. They even naughty claimed that adding low level BR would make fw189 fun.
I don’t know if the same thing will happen with the M10 and M18.
2 Likes
well, as i was trying to say to voyo,
it’s not really about " solving " the issue.
because devs are more for letting everyone playing with their toys.
this mostly apply for premium squads and what not.
it wouldn’t look good if you’d need to play with regular stuff just to use what you payed for.
( and for averange joe, not even being able to… )
and in vehicle senses, it would be a nightmare.
because only good players would get vehicles.
in a sense, premium does somewhat compensate for lack of skill for certain individuals. it’s some sort of " balance "
which the dev team are against restrictive behavior
I’m tired of giving examples because the community is forgetful
3 Likes
yeah… regarding certain topics they are… questionable.
but i was more talking for the score system, devs will never apply it. because they are foundamentally against it.
and… it would kinda hit against their own market.
it’s like shooting your self in the foot.
Which players not included in the market
if that would be the case, we wouldn’t have a game.
I sometimes rarely use we
Because I can only voice players who share my interests.
that’s… a contraddiction my friend.
No, this is not a contradiction.
Games are diverse, and some player’s vision is narrow.