Buff MP35/1

It’s true that armour is very cringe and looks like those spamming it try to overcompensate.
But that’s just russians devs being biased, there’s no workaround it.

Moscow still remains a very nice campaign, even without br3 weaponry though. It was my favourite, and most difficult campaign before Berlin came.

Yes, my friend. It’s because Soviet players keep wearing steel plate body armor that’s out of historical proportions that Axis players need to increase the armor-piercing power of their level 3 weapons. In previous historical campaign modes, there was no such thing as steel body armor in the Moscow campaign. But now, all I see are Soviet Iron Man players carrying this ridiculous thing around, and they won’t allow other players to point out any errors or problems.

Oh my goodness, shut up already.

2 Likes

No, because I told the truth and you started complaining to everyone. In Enlisted, selfish people are not welcome by anyone.

Can you bloody read?

2 Likes

You are honestly the biggest tism coper on this forum with some of the worst takes. Not only that, you can’t even read people’s posts properly without going into some rabbit hole rant over unrelated slop. Just log off already.

1 Like

Devs should have heard people’s suggestions long ago.
Perhaps they intend to maintain status quo


2 Likes


MP 35/I stats if dev actually cared about historical accuracy instead of using it to make excuses.

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

No, all I know is that you level 3 Soviet plate armor players don’t want the Axis players to get any benefits, otherwise you’d start throwing tantrums and acting like scoundrels.

I dont play Soviets, I play Germans.

Stop lying and stop spamming nonsense.

2 Likes

I told him 5 times already, if he keeps on doing it 'll flag him for spamming.

1 Like

Stop making excuses. Arguing is pointless. The Axis players are only objecting because the MP-35/1 submachine gun can’t penetrate Soviet steel armor. Because you Soviet players have been wearing plate armor since the Battle of Moscow. You don’t want to be ordinary soldiers; you want to be invincible Iron Man, right?

Do whatever you want. The scammer upstairs has already deleted several of my messages for no reason, so deleting one more won’t hurt.

Okay, last try, why do you insist that I play Soviets? Should I show you my profile?

Body armor this body armor that when does it end

These body armor vests are endless. Today I even saw a Chinese player wearing plate armor that’s only seen in the Battle of Berlin during the Battle of Stalingrad, then spraying bullets everywhere with a Thompson submachine gun. If it weren’t for completing a semi-automatic rifle mission, I really wouldn’t want to use a semi-automatic rifle in a Tier 3 match against a bunch of politically idiotic idiots who don’t even understand WWII history.

No, and I won’t explain everything to you, because what I’ve seen and heard has convinced me that some things are simply unchangeable in the short term.

Well let me explain something to you to proof you an idiot.

I hate body armor and its pure soviet bias.

I have created countless topics about armor in the past. I have the most comments about how bad soviet armor is on the entire forum - yet you specifically call me a body armor defender because I disagree with you about buffing MP35.

Seriously grow up.

No, I don’t need you to prove anything. Just take four units equipped with semi-automatic rifles, play a day in Tier 3 matchmaking, and you’ll see. Submachine guns are useless, semi-automatic rifles are just firewood, and there’s a whole bunch of Soviet Iron Men appearing and disappearing like ghosts. Then you’ll realize who the real fool is.