Who cares? Just you! Yes… that is exactly what it’s doing… except you think that luxury should only be given to US for some reason.
Oh, now you are using “It’s just a game” argument? What happened to your “UsA mUsT gEt tHe bEsT BaR BeCaUsE HiStOrIcAl” argument? Have some consistency why don’t you? You are changing your opinion on a whim like a chameleon just to make your already ridiculously selective, double standard cope sounds less ridiculous. Make it make sense.
That’s probably the stupidest opinion i’ve ever seen in here and that says a lot since i’ve seen a lot of stupid opinions. 
1 Like
Yes, it’s a game, therefore game logic must be used in accordance with “historical accuracy”.
What’s stupid is trying to make every faction the same.
I would bet money that the majority of people who play all the factions/nations would rather have a different gaming experience for each instead of the same for each.
They came in here saying “german bias”… projecting hard with that one.
Mhm. And germany had the most powerful tank weaponry and armor wise… so you didn’t require super pershing… i doubt you’d agree with that.
This is portrayed in game. They are the best in br1 and 2 all around. Panther/tiger is also the best tank in br4 all around, and guess what?..the king tiger is best all around in br5. Br3 is the only bracket that doesn’t give germany straight up superior tanks and is more even across the board. If germany has the king tiger in game without any of it’s historical downsides and other historical elements for balance, then super pershing is fine. If the game stopped at regular tiger/panther, or portrayed true U.S. air superiority amongst other things then no super pershing could of been left out. There were hardly any king tigers in battle, so the difference there isn’t worthy enough argument on it’s own. However the u.s. only getting m9 launchers would of been fine if they got 17-pounder AT guns in game before the ofenror.
Things can be left out if other things exist. This is my core argument.