Seeing a need to create a new direct-fire infantry support self-propelled gun for the infantry, Alkett developed a self-propelled artillery piece based on the chassis of the Panzer IV medium tank in service. The vehicle became known as the Sturmpanzer IV , though it would become known more popularly by the nickname Brummbär (German: “Grouch”) that the Allied intelligence assigned to it.
With 300 units manufactured between March 1943 to May 1945, the Sturmpanzer IV saw its first use at the Battle of Kursk and was present at most major combat operations afterwards, proving to be an extremely effective tool for neutralizing fortified positions, enemy troops, and armored vehicles.
tt
bp
event
premium
0voters
br3/4 he only
br5 heat and he
Armour
front / side / back
Hull
100 / 40 / 20 mm
Turret
100 / 50 / 80 mm
Visibility
98 %
Crew
Brumman would be better at killing shermans then shermans killing brummbar
If brumman is br4 with heat 105 is br3, sorry grieving over 105
The bruhman at br4 can kill most us tanks with he but crowell, jumbos, pershings need overpreasure
I feel that It have too much armor for BR3 then a guy will come saying nooo aim for the weakspots the problem is that the soviets should get something on the TT that is able to Pen It properly on BR2 even most BR3 tanks struggle to kill It at least soviet ones Usa get the Cromwell with 122mm Pen the M10/M18 with 140mm Pen or the shermans with 104mm Pen but soviets get mostly 70mm or like 80 and like 130 on the T-34-57 but no one use that one because garbage HE filler on both HE and APHE shells.
Also the USA M1 57mm AT canon can Pen the brummbar but the soviet 45mm is just garbage for that also the sturmpanzer with the same gun is already BR3 soo I don’t think the will add a much more armored sturmpanzer on the same BR.
Look the problem for add It to BR3 is that soviets have basically no Pen but enougth Pen for kill BR3 German and japanese tanks there is people asking for the Chi tos for go to BR3 but that would just be too much for that BR is like say that the T-34-57 should go to BR2 It have way too much armor for figth BR1-2 idk what they could add for counter It as a tank and not a TD because Germany and Japan get turreted tanks(Ho-I and PZ III J1 or puma) that can Pen the KV-1 KV-2 only thing I think they could give them is the SU-85A but thats just a SU-76M soo is not turreted I can only think on give them a captured PZ III J1 or something.
front pen the brummbar in a game where gray tanks are impossible to flank, and thus get the 90 degree angle you need
with he shells or aphe shells, or anything that can kill more than one crew at a time
The M1 only have AP here on WT the tanks that use It have APHE and AP but no HE the tank situation is balanced for now add stuff like that at downtiered BRs would break the already bad balance
I miss him kind a bit in Br 3 but i dont say there should not be a BR4 version with Heat rounds,
There could be 2 Versions of this vehycle one with HEAT in BR4 and a version without Heat in BR3.
Or more easy to add 2 options for this vehycle with Heat it will be BR4 if would you click no Heat Ammo it would be BR3.
Now by Aircrafts in the game countdown there is the option how much fuel you have what is most likely the most non important option possible.
Oh yeah I forgot abouth the ISU the ISU have worse frontal armor than the brummbar at least on the front they could just give Germany the StuH 42 without the track armor and make the tracks armor a skin or something
if you dont want the machine gun then just stick with br3, and no br3 no mg for you
its 150mm gun, 100mm of armor and a machine gun at br4
even without a mg its not br3 with it, hell no is it br3
