- Yes
- No
0
voters
A cheap anti-tank weapon that’s in BR3? that makes no sense. Should this be lowered to BR2 or better yet BR 1? It’s only effective up to 60 meters and it’s next upgrade should be in BR 3 or BR 2 category not beyond that?
1 Like
0/10 bait
5 Likes
What are you sniffing?
7 Likes
Probably what the funny mustache man sniffed.
2 Likes
My God…
3 Likes
No, I stand behind the devs and the community when I say this is a change that will destroy the game/make it incredibly frustrating to play. It already has a delicate balance and this would undo everything the devs have been building on for the last few years.
They specifically made AT launchers BR II+ for a reason. The range sucks yes but so does the range of EVERY AT weapon in the game. Range means nothing when you can use a single well placed shell to destroy a tank in 1 hit. Launchers require skill, just like any AT weapon/vehicle if you look at post pen and pen in general you would see how the faust 60 and all other launchers is extremely unbalanced at BR I. No launcher belongs below BR II, BR I is for AT rifles. Changing that would not only make the game frustrating but would effectively dry up the cash flow from people spending money to buy squads, silver, premium, etc. Changes like this are just “asking to kill the game” from a Dev standpoint, player standpoint and publisher standpoint.
2 Likes
Well the suggestion was purely based on that to my knowlege you have a single use with the panzefaus. so to get more ammo you need to find a ammo crate point built by engineer which is not reliable
For br 2 panzerfaust we should get panzerfaust 30 from the editor but it needs new 3d model since it is using panzerfaust 100 model right now
Not to be rude but, ur knowledge is wrong. as u can see in picture panzerfaust has 6 ammo which 6 use. also judging by the picture, you don’t have faust, and you didn’t use it in matches yet. so without full knowledge and experience, why did you decided to make an suggestion? this thing is hunts king tigers in br 5 and you think it will be balanced against t-60 ?
4 Likes
why would you need a goddamn panzerfaust against BR1 tanks with <20mm of armor?
7 Likes
pffffff
Well let’s stop and think for a second.
USSR has a M1 bazooka as early as BR2 and a Panzerfaus at BR3 then some reason they have a Panzefaus 100 as well at BR4.
USA once again are provided with a Bazooka at BR2 and PIAT and B9 Bazooka at BR3 and somehow USA at BR5 also have a German RPzB. 43 Ofenrohr where if you read the description of it it points that it is a captured german bazooka from USA so what is up with this.
Germany’s tech tree only offer a Panzerfaus at BR3 and the RPzB. 43 Ofenrohr exactly as above at BR 4 and then a Panzefaus 100. There must some mistakes here with the whole thing. it doesn’t make sense.
because they captured a lot of panzerfausts from the volkssturm and they need powerful anti-tank weapons at high BRs
its br4, exactly like the german ofenrohr
germany has both the faust 100 and ofenrohr at br4 because its a leftover from the campaigns, which either featured one or the other, then with the merge they ended up having 2 launchers at high BR
fauspatrone my friend
2 Likes
I wouldn’t object to your suggestion of the early Panzerfaust 30, but forget about the Panzerfaust 60. Furthermore, you should know that the GrB39 anti-tank grenade in the game has been severely nerfed in terms of historical accuracy. In reality, its armor-piercing capability is only comparable to the Soviet VGPS-41 grenade, around 55mm. In the game, it’s 90mm, which is closer to the early Panzerfaust 30’s 110mm armor penetration.
Source for this? GRB39 in game is using Gross Panzergranate 46 which did have 90mm of penetration.