I got nothing better to do
Lol. Then to be against people wanting simple choice to larp in their lineups. Haha. I respect the openness.
Someone’s angry devs aren’t listening to social media spam ![]()
His name is either intentionally or unintentionally misspelled in the game, so, checkmate I guess?
The copyrights yo
“i guess” Wow. Your attitude is really showing through. Hmm… maybe post on the april fools announcement about your wants and needs again… maybe they’ll listen.
I’m not taking your ragebait.
No need. Pretty clear you are just annoyed by your wants not getting listened to so you just go against others which aren’t related to yours whatsoever for the hell of it… even said it yourself.
youre bored… you have nothing else to do but unreasonable disagree against something
You won’t interact with my honest question.
You have avoided it twice now.
Would you like the mills grenade removed?
It’s menu blot.
I am entitled to have my own opinion, just as you are entitled to your own opinion
If it had a german designation, then it had to have been used by the germans
It has a different model so I think thats barely enough to warrant keeping it around. It functions the same but it does have a different appearance so I would say that’s just barely unique enough to keep it
Taking inspiration from other members. Hmm… no shame in following up the actions of your peers.
Now i’m a what do you call it “newgen” here but
…
seems the right thing to point at here… if i understand it.
Germany was weird and gave designations to literally every foreign piece of equipment. Even lend-lease Reising submachineguns in USSR service had a designation
Even .22 training cadet rifles in the USSR had German designations, Kl.Kal.G 205(r) for example. Do you think the German army used .22 cadet rifles captured from the USSR?
Like i said there isn’t a reason to keep it around if we aren’t catering to roleplay purposes… it is the EXACT same context.
Also i’ll repeat you again… it’s menu bloat.
It’s the same as the other grenade… the model being different is the same as the name… again catering to faction loadouts.
However i’ll acknowledge again that it’s because of leftover from pre merge most likely… however why did they stay? Like you said it’s just menu bloat.
You can downplay it but it’s no different than a model being different… both are serving to cater to faction loadouts
Consistently repeat myself and that’s just because it’s so obvious.
I still think it is menu bloat and it would be ideal if the UK grenades could have different stats than the USA grenades
Then the same applies to every other example less they he removed.
And again using your own logic constructed out of boredom against you why should such development resources be invested in that? It’s not a bug.
My original statement was intended to convey the idea that bug fixes should be a higher priority than helping people get immersed in the game that isn’t intended to be immersive. Obviously bug fixing shouldn’t strictly be the one and only priority, as I believe game balance is something else that is valuable too for example
Please do suggest such bug fixes, report them, and or continue to spam the news posts with your concerns then.
Was a provoking comment earlier but now it’s just obvious… ok i get it you may be frustrated with the devs not listening to your balancing changes but it doesn’t mean you should channel your frustration into preventing others from achieving their COMPLETELY UNRELATED goal.
You’re free to make your unwanted opinion known. I’m no stranger to that… just wanted to pick at it a bit but i appreciate your honesty.
There’s no need to give anything back, Germany can still use the SCRM grenade
