I’m for either solution, just do something. And my option is more competent than yours anyways
So you are not cosidering the abillity to Anti Tank?? What we should do is to add More He to Ha To instead of put this monster to BR I
Alecto has 2.6 (8.7) second longer reload. Is lower to ground which is bad for open toppers, and doesn’t have a high damage at round. It definitely is worse.
But it does have a faster forward gear, is smaller and so a bit harder to spot, and has more than 7 HE shells.
Still not good enough to be BR2, but not worse than the Na-To
This is why I chose to insult you, you didn’t even read what I said. The Na-To isn’t much more effective against tanks than the M8 Scott, objectively slightly better but not by much.
germany has the 75mm italian TD
1 Like
We don’t need to be dropping Japanese tanks when you can get this low mileage Boat tank 
. What’s not to like about it. It’s slow, it’s weak, it floats on water without the need of flex seal, and, best of all, it looks gay as hell. 
It’s the only Japanese Tank I use, on the rare occasion I actually use a tank. 
1 Like
Has no HE
M8 is br2
I’ve never use this tank before , or in my team or in the other side… so I don’t know…
Those APCBC shells are the biggest HE shells you get at BR1, they have a ton of explosive filler. The Enlisted resource doesn’t show their fragmentation, so the Chi-Ha might still be better in terms of HE. Think before you speak
And it’s something you see a lot in low tier Japan. And if the M8 Scott is a whole BR better than the Na-To then what does that say needs to be done?
Because it’s terrible, and therefore needs to be dropped down to where it rightfully belongs. I’ve never even see one kill a tank before outside the times I used it.
fine just remove he shells, again we dont need a infantry swatter at br1
as many people have said at br1 it would only fight br1 and 2 so no
Are the 7 HE shells too much for you? A tank with no HE shells or machine guns is useless in an infantry game, which would defeat the purpose of dropping it to BR1 in the first place
yes because the 75mm with any shell type would be able to kill just about any br 1 or 2 tank
again br2 is more then low enough unless its replace by a 75mm lv howitzer it does not belong in br1 that the point
either it gets to be some bizarre uber br1 tank killer or it can kill infantry, so unless they agree to strap a mg to it no you dont get a hv 75mm gun that can kill br3 tanks and slaughter infantry at br3
Just say you’ve never used the Na-To before. Plus Japan kinda needs a tank destroyer at BR1 considering all its tech tree tanks have 45 mm of pen at most. Might as well give it a tank that’s only good for one tapping tanks and terrible in every other category.
i have used the na-to before and yes it sucks
it sucks br2 levels of suck
but without he or heat or aphe
then yeah it could be a br1 tank destroyer, but no not with he not even 7 rounds
with an high explosive shell it would not suck at killing infantry
Okay so another HE spam crybaby, does anyone have an actual counterpoint to what I’m saying?
the point is it cant be both
it cant be able to pen every tank at its br and br above
then be able to sling he
its not being a crybaby
you want a tank to go from underpowered to overpowered