The Japanese wanted to win so much that they want to move a long 75mm gun to BR I.That’s realy crazy
1 Like
Br 2 also faces br 3. Just so you know
it have a long 75mm gun, “a long 75mm gun”. Any faction dont have this in BR I, is able to cover up all the shortcomings that Na To have. Is impossible to put it in BR I. The Flack 88 is like this tank and its in BR III, and is a premium squad, Na To is just a tank on TT
1 Like
I agree with that.
The reason this is in BR3 is entirely because of APCR.
However, APCR is less capable to deal with BR4.
What you need to understand is there’s generally philosophies associated with each br. Br 1 doesn’t get machine guns or launchers. Br 5 gets the jets. Br 3 gets the 10 round semi autos. Etc.
That’s a very rigid way of looking at things, and they’ve already bent those kinds of guidelines before.
Well there’s very good reasons for them existing. Here the reason is he spam that can only face br 1 and 2 is BS
And you haven’t made a good case for the nato to be br 1 when it can just be put in br 2 with it shell distribution adjusted
Except the Flak 88 is much better than the Na-To. It’s obvious that you’re one of the smooth brained morons who pisses themselves whenever a bigger number appears on screen.
Bigger number does not equate to better gun.
I ve already know that you’re a crazy Japanese who only knows to launch personal attacks and fantasizes about “Making Japan Great Again.” I’m waiting for the forum administrator to delete your posts XD
Use data and facts to convince me, to convince everyone who voted against it, instead of personal attacks.
I would agree with that, but I’m making the case for how it is currently. It’s a casemate that can be front penned by .50 cals, it has no machine guns, it’s crew is exposed from every angle, it only has 7 HE shells which are worse than the HE shells that BR1 already has to face, it’s slow, it’s a massive target, it has 16 worthless rounds waiting to be cooked off, and it seems like I’m the only one who’s tested it in real battles.
What is bro even rambling about anymore, red herrings to hide the fact that you just don’t understand the game.
I’ve played it a lot in wt but not enlisted. It has some pretty good strengths. It’s not meant to be a meta pick. Just redistribute shells and put it in br 2. Same with marder 2 h.
I’m not trying to make it meta, I wouldn’t even use it if it was BR1. But BR1 is where some things belong, even if their cannon is big and scawy
There is only one tank with an effective he round that I could see going to br 1. And that’s the Alecto which is substantially worse than the nato
Could you tell me what is the “fact”, All I see is you repeating your absurd arguments without providing any data comparison.
Okay, let’s compare it to the M8 Scott, a tank you will see quite a bit in low tier Japan.
Here are the stats for the M8 Scott’s HEAT and HE shells.
And here are the stats for the HE on the Na-To. As you can see the stats are quite similar to one another.
The key difference is that the M8 Scott gets 40 rounds of HE to sling against BR1 Japanese players, while the Na-To gets 7. On top of that, the Na-To is slower, has a slower reload, isn’t much more effective against tanks, is a casemate, has no machine gun, has no armor, and has most of its crew completely exposed including the gunner and commander who can be shot from the front.
No, I just disagree with your clearly incompetent opinion.
To put this vehicle to BR1 is straight up terrible solution. But it would definitely deserve change in ammunition and probably could be lowered to BR2.
1 Like
The Alecto definitely needs to be BR1, but I wouldn’t call it substantially worse than the Na-To. It could be worse depending on your play style, but nothing is worse than the Na-To