BR3 and BR4 Madsen

[Kriegerfaust007-live]

• Yes BR3 Germany 40 round
• Yes BR3 Japan 40 round
• Yes BR4 Germany 80 ROUND DRUM
• Yes br4 Japan 80 round drum
• Yes BR3 USSR 40 round
• Yes BR3 US/UK 40 round
• Yes BR4 USSR 80 ROUND DRUM
• Yes br4 US/UK 80 round drum
• No

I think Japa could easily have acquired the short barrel Madsen during its conquest. German could have captured Madsen from multiple counties letting her have all but the short barrel model. USSR and UK bought models the UK kept 300 of 900 produced after WW1.

You get a Madsen you get a Madsen everyone gets a madsen is not what i am asking for. I think the best choice is to add more Madsen to USSR and japan who suffer from bad low tier machine guns. The madsen like the bars or brens have a large number of similar guns. maybe even adding the 25 round madsen to japan as well.

[КвасноеСусло]

It seems to me that with such options, multiple choice voting would be more appropriate.

[sans999]

In my opinion, it would be appropriate to add that weapon to the Soviet or Allied side. At least, Germany already has sufficient machine guns, so it doesn’t seem to have a reason to possess this weapon.

[Axismodeus]

a refreshingly sensible suggestion. It’s grounded in actual gameplay gaps — the Soviets and Japanese both have weak low-tier MG options — while still backing the placement with legitimate history
maybe german doesnt need another captured Madsen, and giving it one would add nothing. Japan getting a short-barrel variant (maybe 25-round mag) and the Soviets getting a BR3 40-rounder is exactly the kind of balanced, needs-based addition we should be asking for.

+1. More suggestions like this