Boomerang MK2 to BR1

Well yes Boomerang have good payload Zero better performance but the payload is miserable. So yeah both of the planes are BR I material. There is a lot of US and Japanese planes that need to be moved to BR I.

The bombs are actually pretty similar to the boomerang’s. Has same max damage as the 109’s bombs, which isn’t much less than the 250lb gp, and the 60kg bombs actually have more frags than the 250lb gps.

No that’s not true Explosive Mass 23.6 kg vs 28.6 kg G.P. 250 lb Mk.III bomb are better. The Japanese are better vs vehicles but do to how bombs pass vehicles in enlisted its not even good for this.

soldier-boy-aborddelimpala
G.P. 250 lb Mk.III bomb high-explosive weapon and the 60 kg Navy Type 97 Number 6 ground bomb specialized for use against land installations and penetration so what you said is pure BS. Typical allies mains lies not only they have the strongest air force in game but continue with the same lies xD That was some BIAS bait but not on me kid xD

The British G.P. (General Purpose) 250 lb Mk.III bomb has more total metal mass to break into fragments than the 60 kg Japanese Navy Type 97 Number 6 ground bomb.

Brother, we have the spreadsheet showing what I’m saying is true. I already compared the 50kg, 250lb gp and 100kg bombs max damage in a comment just a few up, but you can take a look at the screenshoots in the next comment.

Here’s the proof, made it easy for you to compare.




Clearly you cant read how the 60 kg bomb is better then the G.P. 250 LB ? Becouse it has smaller radius is more concentrated that’s normal is made against vehicles. So how the 60 kg bomb is better then G.P. 250 LB ?

You are looking at one particular stat and somehow you are trying to justify is more important then the rest.

…clearly you can’t read. Maybe read my comment again?

Never said they are better. Have only been saying all the bombs are pretty similar and balanced with one another.

You tried to say the 60kg bombs were a “miserable” payload compared to the 250lb gp. I simply stated they are pretty equivalent, and actually put out more fragments than them. All these planes should be br1. That is my stance.

G.P. 250 LB has more damage and radius means you will make more kills with it…they are not similar at all.

No no tell me in your opinion which bomb is better ?

…I’m done with this pointless conversation. The different bombs here are all pretty damn equivalent. A few stats points up or down doesn’t mean they aren’t similar to one another. The whole point of this is to say the planes all belong in br1. Holy shit man.

And to answer your question, the 100kg fabs are “better”, if the yak 1 is br1 then the boomerang and the zero should be too.

1 Like

Its not pointless it only shows that when it comes to payloads the allies always get better payloads then the axis and its huge balance problem. In higher BRs is even worse. Japan in no BR has better payloads then Allies.

Somewhat

Which are rather irrelevant as all bombs fragments goes upwards in conical shape.
Meaning, you can survive bomb by proning just outside the blast wave area.

And has been for years, devs just accidentally forgot to do same treatment to rockets for several years.
Which is why ppl still today choose rockets over bombs since you can do everything the bombs can do but bombs are miserable against infantry.

The ki-100 is the absolute best br3 fighter? Germany has a bomber in br1 with 400kg of bombs? Stop your whining. Zero would be a beast of a plane in br1. And the 150+/- max damage between the 250lb gp and 60kg bomb is negligible, not to mention the boomerang is a premmy squad.

Germany also gets a br1 fighter with 4 bombs, and another with 250kg bomb. So no, axis isn’t always screwed. U.s. is the only nation in low tier without filler AP rounds as the standard.

Ahh here we go again… its not the best BR III fighter. There is many better planes in BR III then Ki-100 :

Spitfire LF Mk IX,Spitfire Mk Vc/trop , Yak-3 and Fw 190 A-8 all of them are better then the Ki-100 the only good thing about the Ki is the payload. Its very average aircraft nothing too special about it its neither the best boom and zoom neither the best dog fighter at BR III. Ki-100 is very similar to P-51D-5 simply one is better at dog fights the other at boom and zoom however with US you can equip many more aircrafts with Japan there is only one Ki-100. All I see is allies bias not wanting to have real competition.

And if the problem Is with the Zero no problem lets make the game more P2W like the allies P2W faction and add premium Zero at BR I.

I said Japan. Not Germany German air force is much much better then the Japanese.

At best it’s an equal to the P-51D, and that doesn’t give it the payload advantage anyways.

1 Like

Brother, the p51 flys like dog shit compared to the ki-100. The ki-100 is the overall best fighter in the game at br3.

You said axis and japan actually.

The ki-100 is definitely the best overall fighter in game. Spitfire may be faster, and have a slightly faster turn rate? But it’s only got one 250lb bomb. The p51 may be faster with a similar payload (250kg is usually better than 500lb though), but the p51 flys like dog shit compared to the ki-100, and the ki-100 gets auto cannons. Yak 3 has no bombs? Why even bring it up? Fw a8, can’t turn for shit. Nothing about the ki is an average plane. Excellent armament for attack and defense, excellent flying characteristics, and excellent payload. How in the actual f**k can you say this when NO other plane gets all 3 of these things at once? Who cares if you don’t have many other options to choose from? The ki is all you need lmao.

So you are saying boom and zoom aircrafts are bad becouse they cant turn ? If FW and P51 could turn they would be BR VI … and the Spitfire is literally the best prop in the game you can play it in BR V and destroy Jabos even.

If all you’re doing is flying into the ground after dropping the payload and not actually trying to survive in the plane, then yes they are good. But a good turn rate is pretty crucial to the surviving part. Because of how small the maps are coupled with lead indicators, “boom and zoom” will always lead to your death against a decent pilot.

I can reliably take out jets with a prop plane because of those things even though they fly hundreds of kmh faster

I would argue the 109z is in higher tiers. Again, the spitfire only has one 250lb bomb. You must of mis read my statement again. I said the ki-100 is the overall best fighter. Keyword is overall. It is the best rounded out plane because of it’s insanely good turn rate, coupled with it’s insanely good payload, coupled with it’s auto cannons, coupled with It’s decent speed.