Well they will have plenty of time for Poetry in the gulag ![]()
Why are the soviets the only ones with a bayonet on their AR? Why are the soviets the only one with 10% damage reduction for everyone? Why are the soviets the only ones with mag fed TT rifles at BR3? Why are the soviets the only ones without movement dispersion on their BRV LMG?
Wth - Japs and allies doesn’t have bayonets on ar? Why axis have bayonets on smg?
In this topic we are discussing Cuirasses, due to the fact that there is a lot of offtop, people have to create new topics about cuirasses, as there are a lot of offtop in the old topics. After that, you complain that the same themes are being created. You’re trying to provoke people, plus you lack constructive communication. If we take your message, where is the Bayonet on the Gewehr-43 in Enlisted? Where is the bayonet on the STG-44? Where is the bayonet on the Fg-42/2?
the bayonet for the beretta M38 is a premium squad, btw. Just like the PPD 40 DSZ that comes with a bayonet.
They do infact not have bayonets on their ARs. All factions but the Western Axis have bayonets on their SF rifle but that’s not what we were talking about. The Western Axis, what some people falsely call Germany, has one SMG with a bayonet in their TT, the USSR has two ARs with bayonet. Hardly seems fair to have twice as many weapons with bayonets in a category where no other faction has a single one.
The Beretta M1918 very much is not the best SMG on BR2. That title falls either to the PPS-42 or the Thompson M1 when looking at the TT, it’s not even the best Axis SMG as the sights are offset and the magazine blocks a large part of the screen, a fault none of the soviet SMGs have.
The Beretta is not the best. It blocks far too much of the screen for barely any upsides, it chews through it’s ammo far too quickly and the bayonet isn’t rescuing it. Both the Beretta M1 and MP40 are better guns for 95% of situations
You play with a aim? Skill issue. Bad boys don’t use aim, just a hip fire
“Omg guys ppsh41 box is not even broken it has so high rof and small mag that its virtually useless even it has better dispersion than assault rifles”
“Yeah I just hipfire left and right with worst gun of the game no problem l2p noob”
Arent you something
Really difficult to figure out why no one is taking your balance / historical accuracy suggestions seriously
Because the posts you’ve listed, atleast one of them is closed
The similar post to this suggestion is also closed, due to derailment, which states he can make the post
Also Major Mcdonalds has provided a response in accordance to this topic
That in fact he can revisit the topic after the major (Manchuria) update
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I wonder why still aint block me. Bunch of guys here flag all my messages. They just do not want to opposite side and real facts - bd hold 100% of 9mm bullets from some distance.
And please stop protect those who blame people by nation
Ah yes, IgorHistory.com dokcqments.
And anyway, no one cares. This is game balance related topic rather than TotallyCredibleIgorHistory.com subject.
If you do not have any documents which can say something to prove your words - well, better keep silent. Some fake websites makes your position even weaker
Is this again insult by nation?
documents or no documents doesnt change the fact that in game cosmetics shouldnt affect gameplay. if body armor is needed to be a game mechanic, then it should go into bag slot and it should be available to all nations.
I would do this:
- I would remove the cuirass bonus from Customization (customization should not affect gameplay, but is needed to stand out from other players)
- I would transfer the cuirass to the backpack slot (I would make this a factional feature in the game)
- In the backpack slot, I would write that this cuirass gives 10% protection.
Addition: In the game, when customizing fighters, pouches and backpacks often appear, but they do not give anything, since they are in customization, and not in the Backpack slot
I would also remind you that Enlisted is an arcade shooter in the first place and is not a simulator.
Probably ? Credibility was the big question.
Also this once again, even its said numerous times already.
To who? Autor - Yuri Ponomarev, Scientific Editor of Kalashnikov Magazine. This is a magazine of a worldwide known concern, produce AK series. You so funny guy.
What about this?
Document No. 1 / Negative No. 01246. View of the steel breastplate SN-42 with bullet impact marks.
Distances of firing are indicated in meters. Index “b” denotes a bullet with a steel core, index “c” — a bullet with a lead core.

