Bayonet for FG 42 + II

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

Currently all factions select fire rifles have a bayonet and are statistically better than FG 42(II)… giving it a bayonet would make it more on par with other factions rifles.

IMG_2020



IMG_2024

These was rare but despite that there have been things added to balance factions that only existed on paper… this isn’t a stretch.

IMG_2023

Source: https://www.warrelics.eu/forum/seitengewehr-84-98-k98-bayonets/bajonett-fg42-second-german-modell-770231/

9 Likes

The Bayonet is there, it’s just folded up. If the rarity of the bayonet was the problem why model it in the first place?

2 Likes

image

3 Likes

It has been suggested countless times maybe developers don’t wanna give germans a 5-10% recoil reduction to germans God knows why

Ah My God… We are going to wait for it during next 5 years just like we wanted for 100 bullets mg

3 Likes

Only if it is optional like most other bayonets

4 Likes

Wtf lmao…seriously why would they model a bayonet and then not add the bayonet functionality…bruh these devs make me cry

3 Likes

Its not optional, you already have the bayonet on the gun but youre not allowed to use it lol

1 Like

I mean like, The bayonet should be detachable (like the Kar98k or Springfield)

ofc I know you can’t use the bayonet now, I meant if it was added it should be optional

Tbh the bayonet reduces recoil (idfk why) so theres no reason to take them off except cosmetic reasons

Life is temporary, Drip is eternal.

I take most bayonets off, they look ugly as hell

Thats valid. I usually take off the bayonets for troops in vehicles

1 Like

I only give bayonets to soldiers in assault and Flamethrower squads

I wish we could just attach/unfold bayonets in the battle…like especially the foldable ones

3 Likes

Was forwarded, ty for suggesting

3 Likes