It was meant in general, I wasn’t talking about anyone specifically.
I haven’t seen any unbiased concrete evidence here.
4 million? How many hours did this take? Of course, I think the skull in your profile explains everything.
Do I have to mention every little nuance in a post about a weapon? I don’t think I need to insult the intelligence of others by doing so. The Fedorov has a rate of fire of 600, the Scotti Naval Rifle has a rate of fire of 800.
Are you saying the Uragan and the PPSh-41 Box are the same weapon, because they only really differ by rate of fire?
7 Likes
I didn’t count, but now I’m in rehab after surgery and I played all day long, yes, a lot.
1 Like
However, it is fun to watch those who believed that a 15 round magazine was suitable for AVS and AVT and that there was no need for a 20 round magazine cry.
I wish you good health.
2 Likes
I put in the past many times but I never put effort researching it since I could not even finish my italian-german faction I got bored so I given up on it I had to upgrade my italian - German faction but I never did it.
Well show one source that it claims it have 15 we know that Italians loved double stack mags for their LMGs. So I don’t know how they suddenly decided to make a single stack mag for their LMGs.
4 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
The difference in mag capacity is much greater than in rof. Especially if we are talking about full auto weapon that has potential to OHK.
We are not talking about smgs that need multiple shots to kill.
So yes, you are insulting my intelligence by deliberate manipulation.
You know exactly for what you were pushing. And comparison to smgs is pure BS.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
GO Play CS WW 2 games have vehicles they where essential part of the war.
Listen man, you set a standard with your argument that I was trying to make the weapons the same, because I didn’t mention the rates of fire in my comment. I refuted your argument by maintaining that standard against an example of two other weapons in the game. I guess I could have used the exact same argument by comparing the AVS and AVT, as well as the FG 42 I and FG 42 II.
I guess not making my mission statement with 2 paragraphs for each post is manipulation? I like to think I’ve been consistent with my arguments for historical reference (keep things like Cyclic Rate, Magazine Size, reload functionality, weight etc tied to historical accuracy, use game-specific modifiers such as Recoil, Dispersion, Reload speed, and circumstantially Damage to bring the weapon to a place of balance), but I could be corrected.
At this point, I’m just going to assume you’re rage baiting. I’m sorry that I can’t be perfect for you, and I hope you find inner peace.
12 Likes
Okay.
Instead of saying
“more like Fedorov”,
I’ll make sure to say
“since the weapon fired a 6.5mm rifle cartridge and had a 20 or 25 round magazine capacity, we can look at a gun like that in the game, the USSR trees’ Fedorov Avtomat for reference. The Fedorov Avtomat, firing 6.5x50mm Arisaka, deals 13.9 damage, and the 6.5x52mm Carcano, with similar ballistics (bullet mass and muzzle velocity), should have similar or the same damage, somewhere around 13.9. Depending on current sources available, the short magazine should either have a 20 or 25 round capacity. However, these weapons do have some differences: The rate of fire in the Fedorov Avtomat is 600 rounds per minute. The Scotti Naval Rifle, however, is 800 rounds per minute. Because of this, we want to make sure the Scotti Naval Rifle has some sort of disadvantage to the Fedorov, by making sure one or more stats such as it’s recoil, dispersion, reload speed, or EDT (maybe I’m forgetting a couple) is worse than the Fedorov’s.”
This is essentially what you’re asking for. Twisting my words because I’m not elaborating to this level of detail is intellectually dishonest, and insulting to others who are reading this.
10 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Well I really doubt we know exactly the rate of fire of the weapon. This is something we cant test so we need to trust the book. But in real life this thing was LMG and it was used as LMG :
So it was more similar to LMG then to Fedorov. Considering the year of its production of the The Scotti Naval Rifle I cant ignore the similarities with the SIG KE 7. So if I put it closer to a weapon its closest weapon for comparison really is SIG KE 7.
-Both the Scotti and the KE 7 use a combined gas and delayed blowback operation.
-They employ an under-barreled short-stroke gas piston to unlock the bolt, which is then followed by a blowback action.
-Both weapons fed from detachable box magazines, a feature common in automatic rifles of the period.
-A key visual similarity is their compact design, featuring a short, stubby barrel with a distinctive shroud that often included cooling fins. This was a common design choice to keep the weapons manageable as light automatic weapons.
So its really close to SIG KE7 its the closest comparison I can make to a WW 2 weapon. Even the magazine sizes where the same probably.
3 Likes
we want a magazine size increase. Fairly sure there has been discussions that has proven the magazine was supposed to be double-stack and whoever modelled the rifle for Enlisted got it wrong and created a single-stack magazine
18 Likes
germany is fantastic in the br3 lmg department, i would prefer something more unique than that
Well the version that they added to the game is not the LMG version
So this thing can be fitted to all roles since its pure paper prototype not the product that was actually made. So this thing can be like Fedorov it can be like FG it can be assaulter ,LMG or Rifleman squad weapon. Its really up to the imagination of the game developers since really can fit all roles. However the mags for sure are 20,25 ,40,50 same like SIG KE 7.
4 Likes