ahahahha gambling addicts xD
4 Likes
see more bp weapons
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
We really need camouflage selection option in Battle menu for match.
Such a low cost way to encourage more gold spending for players on skins and BP … 
3 Likes
Well, daaayum, my main man Slakrrrrr with the WW2 receipts
Well, this is the source I gave them, which caused the change to the cyclic rate, but didn’t also change the magazine capacity (for some reason).
The gun has it’s own unique characteristics that make it different from something like a Fedorov, but I guess Gaijin wants it to be different, but in their own way? It reminds me of World of Tanks when it began it’s decline around 2017: they stopped caring about historical reference, and just made stuff up for balance by making everything similar. Historical reference is a great way to give weapons their own interesting flavours, while keeping them well-represented and preserved in a digital space.
Either way, it’s great that the devs have been changing things to be more accurate, but it’s the selective “we will change this, but not that” that doesn’t make sense to me. I foresee them EVENTUALLY changing the magazine size, but it makes sense both historically and from a marketing perspective for it to be done BEFORE or DURING the battle pass it can be acquired from, not after.
18 Likes
Are you kidding me? You were literally pushing for it to be more like Federov.
Why are you acting like you were suggesting the opposite. Because you didn’t.
1 Like
Well but in real life the weapon was exactly something like more advanced version of Federov it was not STG for sure. It was something like BAR,Feodorov and SIG KE7 its not an assault rifle. Is it something like FG 42 well I doubt that also. Its more like like exactly as Fedorov Avtomat a proto assault rifle that is more of a LMG then a assault rifle and it has many similarities with Feodorov,BAR and SIG KE 7. If it was assaulter weapon with 25 rounds and 800 rpm would be Axis Fedorov exactly would it made it unique. I could have been like MKb 42(M) very unique axis weapon I wish I had more of them.
2 Likes
Is it possible to give us the ability to choose the default fire mode? I think the new changes to the Fedorov 25 have made it unusable in full auto mode. It would be great if we could choose to have it be semi auto by default.
2 Likes
not anymore since it got moved to br 3 so i agree
after almost 3 fucking years
is literally the american premium paratroopers SMG it has a good accuracity same goes to hip fire 10.0 damage and high rof along a good mag an nonexistent recoil i would say it my top 2 soviet nonsense after federov cuz u cant spam it like federov (thank to god )
while you dont give them the propper stuff they are not and while they FUCKING MARKED THE PARAS PLANE which i honestly find them not worth but the fact You can bring paras to every BR along with interesting and reworked loadouts can give You a plently opportunities
Like all the buildings when they are not placed on the perfect moment and unlike MGs or cannons this one is a RMN-50 with auto firing mode and if you place it on closed areas it can do a very good job
and stinger yea only expection that doesnt need any explanation is what the german mg42 200 event version should be but oh wait we didint had a belt fed mg on those days + the mag of this thing is literally innacurate
2 Likes
Yeah At least on consoles it becomes a bit uncontrollable, my friends and I normally use it in semi mode even at short distances as if it were a VG 1-5
1 Like
I would be unique only to Axis mains. For people that doesn’t incline only to axis faction. It would be just reskin of federov with slightly tweaked stats.
I fail to see the uniqueness.
Federov should have been an MG or SF rifle in the first place. If irl classification should be respected. Just like type Hei Auto.
But it’s an obvious double standard as always. Sometimes people don’t mind inconsistencies (if it goes in line with their agenda) and sometimes they do (if it goes against their agenda).
It’s obvious the only reason they’re pushing for change is because they think the weapon is weak or not fitting their playstyle. Not because it is inconsistent with game’s standards or history. That’s just an excuse.
1 Like
Not only for new players also since they can buy the BP and go to BR V matches. Every time I see high rate of fire Axis Assaulter weapon I like to have it since this faction really lacks them.
Well yes its strange but thats thanks to the 5 BR system that we got in reality this game could have had 4 BRs with only Semi Autos for Rifleman would be far more fun game then having BR V.
2 Likes
I don’t even care about crap like Fedorov Automatic or Scotti. They are basically the same SF weapons, but with less damage and a limited number. At least real assault rifles like STG44 and AS44 are unique.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
and sadly the developers doesnt listen to our feedback whenever is supposed to help the community they wanna do the thing their own way and we are not gonna get out this rabbit hole unless they start propelly fixing the things
the guerrillas were supposed to stop grey zone stuff but they are nothing but assults able to flank rallies which is great but they were supposed to stop a bigger problem
snipers aswell do you think that snipers are really useful on other stuff rather than annoying the enemy? i would like to give them a flare able to mark enemies like on BF1 or somethign that could make this class more versatile
most of these suggestions are focused to the bots sadly they are stupid asf devs tried to fix them since game release but it only get worse with every update
i cant belive this game have almost 9 years and they never tried to make a simple AI but useful like red easy 2 i cant belive that 1 guy with limited resources screwed 9 years of development of a proffesional company
I think the sources on this weapon are so inconsistent and unreliable that it’s no tragedy if the developers take creative liberties in favor of a unique game style over historical accuracy.
It’s not going to be immersion breaking.
Especially since all of these sources are practically just “look at this thing I just googled up to prove my point”. Even you never heard about the gun before it was announced.
Well like many prototypes but not only there is many weapons that are not prototypes and yet they are made wrong. The problem is majority of the time the allies claimed historic balance to nerf Axis weapons and now when we all know this weapon didn’t have 20 rounds since even without the sources you can see that this weapon cant have 15 rounds mag it can have 20 or 25 still they picked the worst option.
Thats not true 
Italian and British Equipment that needs to be in the Tech Tree - Suggestions - Enlisted
Italian-German Faction or the Great split of Axis Faction - Suggestions - Enlisted
3 Likes
Keep up the good work and don’t forget about the other stuff
2 Likes
This time I freaked out and saved up 4 million. I think I’ll record a video and post it on YouTube.
2 Likes