I actually do a lot better with rifles
1 Like
I have been trying to get the game to change so I can properly make content on it, learn people how to get stuff done through tutorials, etc, but I simply can not support a game if there is just P2W of this margin.
But you can carry those on the assualters?
And itâs exactly why you need to stay 
Normandy was well done, much better than Moscow. Whatâs there to hate?
True, Moscow needs a lot of rework with the map sizes but it is more than doable.
The only thing I think the devs f**ked up are colours, weather and saturation. Too bright, cartoony and awkward especially for a ww2 game
The imminent progression system they are going to add to it?
Alright we should probably make a new thread for this discussion
Only Mosin 1907 and gewehr 33 which do small damage and have bad RoF.
They changed that?
First positive change I have heard of in months
but back on topic: change the campaign system to a year system for progression so new maps can be added without breaking up the player base.
1 Like
Not badâŚnot bad, I like your opinion. You should make a topic about that. Might actually work
I really wish they wouldnât monetize changing progression speed at all and instead, focus on selling unique weapons and squads.
They just did that
1 Like
Problem is that those are most often those can be P2W
That is actually genius.
That way you can also implement lend-lease equipement, like having american players with american gear play on moscow maps, etc.
Now when I think about it, wouldnât it make early war battles a place to bully new players and 1945 battles into pro player Gang-Bang
Well actually, not really.
In early war, you would almost entirely see bolt actions only.
It would become a pretty skill-based environment where the options for weapons are limited, the guns hit hard, yet punish you for missing shots.
It does require a total rework of every progression mechanism, removing all verticality for weapons and soldiers
SVT and gewehr were present in early stages of war too. By germans gewehr was never used more than Kar throughout the war while Soviets armed their urban combat troops mostly with SVTâs and PPShâs. Mosin was used by engineers, snipers and in long range combat (long range which we donât even have in the game). Devs will probably make players choose what rifle they want like they did in Moscow playtest. New players would probably choose semi automatic rifles which are garbage in Enlisted so they would constantly get slaughtered by veterans. There is a solution to this, itâs called skill based matchmaking but it is not easy to implement considering we donât have any sort of matchmaker in Enlisted
Iâm not thinking a total rework, Iâm just saying to call the existing moscow campaign the 1941 campaign instead, for instance.
Of course it wouldnât necessarily be limited to weapons made specifically in those years, but groups of 2-3 years at a time, with the year putting a hard cap on the newest weapons and a soft cap on older weapons. Not all weapons have to be from that year, just not newer than that year and later in the war, starting weapons would be newer than moscowâs.
Good idea, thatâs actually amazing