War Thunder has a lot of vehicles that have for years been blatantly worse than other vehicles tiered at or below them.
I could give Gaijin the benefit of the doubt for a fresh vehicle’s BR, but when something is so obviously out of place for years and never changes, they just don’t give a shit.
Especially if it’s premium 
The main issue are armored cars. They are all fighting much older vehicles and dominate the battlefield non-stop for 2 years. I hope Enlisted devs are not the same and won’t make these mistakes. They at least listen to the community while WT ignored everything and went with their shitty ideas of balancing. Autocracy of ignoring community brings anger and negative feedback
Gaijin listens to the community when the community asks for something new to pay for.
That’s how helicopters, dreadnaughts, subs, and era VI made it in without making any sense.
…or on wheels instead of tracks
April 1st add the R3 to Enlisted please
I do not think there is a need to discuss this in this topic.
If you guys think war thunder is bad, it only stresses my point more that enlisted is even worse.
And war thunder only has world of tanks to kiinda worry about? But WoT is arcade, so not really.
Enlisted has Post Sciptum, RO2, H&G, Squad, Battlefield games even, to worry about. It’s literally DoA if they released it as it is now to public.
They have dreadnaughts in WT now?
I agree, keep it on topic.
I’m trying to say Enlisted is a lot more balanced than war thunder.
Enlisted has much better horizontal progression, maybe a bit too much vertical progression yet, but not completely fucked vertical progression like War Thunder has.
Sigh going off topic again…
What drew me to enlisted was the bots, I’ve spent countless hours on the original Battlefront games and bots are always a selling point for me.
You play this game non-stop and now you complain how shitty it is. I mean i get it, I also complain a lot because I’m tired of small maps but never say that you hate something you play the most.
What horizontal progression? 100% of enlisted’s progression is vertical.
There is no matchmaker in enlisted
There are perks that give 35% more health, for goodness sake
20% more damage on guns
How is that more balanced than having a mostly functioning BR system, that gets adjusted based on winrates? sure, a vehicle might be terrible and therefore doesnt get played much, but the players that do play it somehow still get decent matches out of it so that’s why those BRs dont change.
Where’s my free Abrams
Bots make a game look more realistic but i think conquest should not have bots included because it looks like putting 100 people inside of a small box
I am on the verge of just dropping Enlisted and going onto another game. I haven’t touched Moscow in weeks now, as I am simply too disgusted by it. Even more after getting a taste of Normandy, no vertical progression, just simple skill based matches. I’m mostly playing war thunder, warframe and tf2 now
Vertical progression is when you replace your mosin dragoon with a mosin 1938, or upgrade a weapon, or level up a soldier.
Horizontal progression is when you unlock assaulters alongside your riflemen. The assaulters aren’t intended to replace the riflemen entirely.
yet they are… strictly… better?
I wouldn’t want you to go, you’re a force on the forums and have taught me a lot about the game.
If the devs truly read the forum, the game is missing a part of itself if you leave.
by poor execution, not by intended design