I would really like to see some other campaigns in the future. Right now we have 4 campaigns confirmed but are there going to be more when the game gets released. All 4 campaigns have Germans as axis team, are there any possibilities that we will se Italians and Japs too?
Also Stalingrad was the bloodiest battle of ww2 and I think it will be much more enjoyable than Moscow
Pacific front will be cool too because It’s very unique and different than Europe and North Africa
3 Likes
As I said in another thread, I would love to include every major power in the war, but it’s also imperative to keep the number of campaigns to a minimum to avoid splitting up the player base.
The optimal campaigns I see (including modifying team layouts on existing ones)
Moscow- Russia vs Germany
Normandy- US and Britain (with French partisans) vs Germany
Berlin- Russia vs Germany (redundant really)
Tunis- Britain and US vs Germany and Italy
Battle of France- France and Britain vs Germany and Italy
Operation Ichigo (probably Zhengzhou specifically, like war Thunder)- China and US (with communist partisans) vs Japan
I’m not sure how marketable ichigo is, but it seems like the most efficient way to condense Japan’s part in the war.
If the playerbase becomes big enough, I don’t see why not add Iwo Jima and Stalingrad. As I said before, Stalingrad was a very famous and important battle in ww2. A lot of players will love to see it.
1 Like
Stalingrad and Moscow happened around the same time, so the developers had to have made a conscious decision to choose Moscow over Stalingrad already, as I don’t see them coexisting as campaigns unless they share progress across different maps.
Moscow is 1941, Stalingrad is 1942-1943. I don’t know why do you have to be so negative about this. Having less campaigns will make some players bored after a long time playing
1 Like
but with late war equipment, so not redundant
generic “pacific island” campaign could work for jap
2 Likes
China getting thrown in at some point is a guarantee looking at War Thunder, so may as well get a head start.
I just wanna see all the random shit China used since literally everyone including Germany and Italy armed them.
2 Likes
Come to think of it, we could see absolute map freedom if the campaign system gets revamped into a year bracket system.
It would function almost identically to how it does now, except instead of progress being tied to a battle it’s tied to a year or set of years.
That way the devs could keep adding new maps and new equipment without breaking up the community further.
I would very much like more campaign’s, but the problem is how its done, with splitting up the player base I don’t think they’ll be able to create the campaigns they’d like to
The player base will become much larger as they advertise/go ftp
2 Likes
i would like to see a Stalingrad company too.
1 Like
yet it will instantly die out due to the horrible state of progression
War Thunder says free players will play through anything.
war thunder at least has mostly balanced gameplay, and is unique.
enlisted is neither of those
1 Like
Isn’t one of the main features of the game asymmetrical balance
I stopped playing WT because of it’s great balance. Such a great game, made me delete my account
1 Like
It was supposed to be but didn’t happen, at least not the way they said it would.
Like the initial explanation was that on D day, the German team would be well dug-in with fortifications, but the American team would be bigger to be able to overrun them.
Nah bro, the Cheeto Late is 4.7 performing like a 3.3 because you rack dishiprine
At least it stops leo2a6s from clubbing reserves, unlike with enlisted.
Sure, its not perfect. that is why i said mostly balanced. But is any game ever truly balanced?