Anzac Day event

Suggestions Weapons
1

The Lee-Enfield No. 6 was an experimental Australian variant of the Short Magazine Lee-Enfield (SMLE) rifle, developed during World War II as a “shortened and lightened” version of the No. 1 Mk III. It was Australia’s equivalent to the British No. 5 Mk I "Jungle Carbine.
image

  • Yes this would be cool
  • No
  • No way I would rather bring the KV1 to BR2
0 voters

The event squad will be the 1st Battalion 2nd AIF.

Why I chose this until

The reason why I chose this unit was because this was the unit my great-grandfather served in during WW2. He fought all across North Africa and was captured along with most of his unit. In the POW camp, he had multiple bones broken by the Germans, who would use their rifle buttstocks to beat him. He survived the war, dying in 1993…
17747691111414638547466230899443

I will add some more information if you guys think it would be cool.

Huge thanks to OggeKing and warfare_master without them none of this would of been possible.

4 Likes
3

Who could have auch visceral hatred for the Anzac as to rather the KV be put in BR 2?

3 Likes
4

Unfortunately, the Rifle No. 5 was a UK only weapon. It was based on the No. 4 Rifle, which only the UK and Canada used as well.

You should consider switching to the Australian unique No. 6 rifle instead, as it’s more accurate to them (as in, they actually had access to them), and because the No. 5 was an actual used, produced, and adopted rifle by the UK, and thus should be in the tech tree.

Here’s an old post of me explaining the differences:

5 Likes
7

Hey, just replace the picture with the No. 6 rifle, and change all mentions to the same, and all mentions of the No. 4 to the No. 1, and no-one will notice. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

3 Likes
8

Thank you so much.

2 Likes
9

You should probably also switch the picture with the one Ogge provided you in his refrence post
image

5 Likes
11

Hey man, I didn’t do nothing here

1 Like
12

Man you two particularly did everything all I did was put it together.

2 Likes
13
Now, being experimental trials weapons, there *were* Australian No. 6 rifles that did try the No. 4 rear-sight composition, so both styles did exist.

A No. 6 with the Australian standard rear sight:
image

A No. 6 with the No. 4 style rear sight:
image

Both were tested, to see which one they liked the most. Because of the shortened barrel, the rear style was prefered.

There’s a third sight composition too, a unique one mounted right behind the charger-bridge:
image

But, for style reasons, the in-game model should probably retain the No. 1 sight composition, to make the No. 6 look more different from the No. 5.

There’s also a question if the rear rear-sight version was post-war or not, I don’t think so, but it’s worth mentioning.

4 Likes
14

Count my vote as yes, I would love a jungle carbine. I just couldn’t resist the joke lol
Screenshot 2026-03-29 175654

3 Likes
15

Discussing new British carbines is fine, but don’t downgrade the KV-2 to Tier 2, because that’s like a primitive man trying to smash a tank with a rock. :laughing:

1 Like
16

My great grandfather until has been updated.

1 Like