I allredy did a post on this
As you can see its 50% not 70%. And buffing it doesnt make sense because this is how it was historicly.
I think you have the better more logical argument here, it is a side grade and not an upgrade like other nation’s tanks. However i know the playerbase will never accept such a logical statement.
Just like i know they’ll never agree the regular pershing should be br4 since they got tiger 1 in br4
2 Likes
Not to metion half the poeple hallucinated the M4A2 76 W having more armor.
I also really enjoy the idea of forcing players to choose one thing or another. Most of my ideas have been shot down hard surrounding such mechanics.
1 Like
Me too man : (
Especially when its historical. One of my favs is my BAR idea.
Ive been working on a remaster but for some reason charts arnt working on this.
Name
Vert. Recoil
Sprint Penalty
Movement Dispersion Increase
While Aiming
Movement Dispersion Increase
Hip Firing
Browning M1918
40
-20%
15.0
5.0
Browning M1918A1
35
-25%
10.0
10.0
Browning M1918A2
30
-30%
8.0
12.0
This is what happens.
I think there hase to be a Game bug .
Or the numbers arent correct [
Gaijin Entertainment makes often mistakes if i am not wrong
Alone this with the radius i can not believe its true.
Its hard to test if the numbers are correct i dont have premium.
Maybe some body hase to put Ai Soldiers or Zombies in a line to test it.
Maybe like this? but i dont have premium.
Honestly, the 76mm cannon is a bit of a stretch for a BR4.
In the US, the only BR4 cannon that fits is the 17-pounder. (or 90mm Jackson)
That’s why I overrate the Firefly. (But It’s Premium)
The 76mm doesn’t have extremely high penetration, but it also suffers from low high-explosive-power.
The reason I make this judgment is that the tank US facing is a Panther.
The Panther has excellent penetration, and the armor are outstanding as well. (can penetrate BR5 Tanks)
The HE shell performance isn’t bad either.
Honestly, the only thing that can compete with the Panther is a tank equipped with a 17-pounder, and in my opinion, the Centurion Mk.1 should be added to the TT.
Since this tank was actually completed and deployed during the war, there is no problem with its appearance. (Only no fighting.)
1 Like
Nope, they are data mined, and the stats do match up.
Did you test if the real stats work the same way in the game?
I doubt it.
Its not just how the datas is mined for the game, its about how if the Implementation works.
Their fucking data mined. What part of that do you not get?
I think you did not write it correctly.
I know bugs dont exist in enlisted LOL.
“bugs”
I promise you the stats of the shells are accurate. It’s how they’re coded to function. You can see all these stats in the player resources thread.
3 Likes
Error, a defect or a deviation from the desired target state in a software or hardware system. [1, 2]
Is it correct?
I think you are the master of arrogance.
Did you really test it correctly .
For example create multyple test Radii with test obyects if the % value is correct , did you doo it?
I think i cant doo it the Reason, i dont have premium in this game.
its a bit subjectiv from me i admit but in Game the He of 75 Sherman is just a Monster against infantry
but to often the 76 He of the Sherman does to often just nothing.
Or it could be a different thing that He Shells and Bombs in the game just fail, and do nothing many other players think the same.
Maybe the in game Failure rate by the 76 sherman He is just higher.
Many gamers in enlisted complain that bombs go some times threw the target and dont doo damage.
I’ve done some inspection, and turns out that M4A2 76mm indeed has a better armor than the M4A2 75mm.
M4A2 75mm has 48mm CHA here
While M4A2 76mm has 60mm CHA here
Also, there’s some interesting thing going on the gun mantlet armor of M4A2 76mm :
Basically, some area on the gun mantlet got an abnormally high protection value than it supposed to have. I suspect that the volumetric armor acting up again in a strange way. Because M4A1 76mm doesn’t have this issue going on on the turret as you can see here :
And one more thing, i do think that M4A2 75mm indeed has a less protective turret armor than the M4A2 76mm, examples here :
So my conclusion is that, i don’t think M4A2 76mm belongs to BR 3 at all.
1 Like
Yeah It loose the weakspots that let BR2 tanks kill It so yeah It shouldn’t go to BR3
1 Like
Only the Chi ha LG,Na To,marders and stug can kill them
Wtf does that have to do with anything? Since when does that logic apply to tiger and panther in br4?
I don’t want to hear about how the m18 can pixel hunt 150m out either. Marder can penn the large part of hull
1 Like
Man if you want to downtier something to BR3 you have to make sure that BR2